Using Old Hardware (ASUS K8N) with Windows 7 & Generic Drivers

DeanFS

Reputable
Sep 16, 2014
4
0
4,510
I have been working on this computer for some time and I have resolved issue after issue, but I am thinking that they are all symptoms of a bigger issue - that I am using Windows 7 generic drivers for my Mobo/GFX card. This is my setup:

-ASUS K8N 754 NVIDIA nForce3 250 ATX AMD Motherboard
-3 GB DDR400 running at 200 MHz
-AMD Athlon 64 3000+ 2GHz
-GeForce FX5200 AGP 8x 128 MB DDR
-Sound Blaster Audigy 0090 PCI

Windows 7 boots to desktop in about 30 seconds. It is responsive, until you run some programs. It can stutter or lock up (not just audio, but video).

I am mostly using generic drivers that come with windows. I did pick up kX project drivers for audio which reduced, but did not eliminate stuttering (mostly in silverlight (netflix) but also in Windows Media Center). I am using NVIDIA's latest Forceware driver for Vista that installed fine in Win7. The Mobo drivers are generic Windows, however.

Zoomplayer plays files flawlessly unless they are encoded inefficiently. Civilization 4 will stutter, but the audio is fine since I turned of antialiasing. I feel like this might be a key to the problem because the difference was very distinct: audio was consistently chopped up until I reduced video quality, at which point audio worked nicely even as the video got choppy during intense parts.

I have fully clocked RAM, CPU & GPU with BIOS and there is no differences evident, even in temperatures.

I wanted to use XP and XP drivers (being OEM) but nowadays programs (like silverlight) actually refuse to install in XP. This is fine because in my experience, Windows 7 is faster anyways. But now I have done everything to make this a nice install of Windows 7, got the audio working OK, but it seems bottlenecked in some fashion.

Is this a problem with using generic Mobo drivers? Is there some kind of rational way to test what the bottleneck is? I am frustrated because the hardware can definitely do the minimum of what I want. It seems to be an issue of interfacing with that hardware though.
 
Solution
Yea you would be a lot better to use Windows XP. I'm not sure why silverlight and such won't install for you, it works on my old PC.

Windows 7 is better usually, but it takes more resources than Windows Xp so that is part of your problem, but the bigger problem is probably its trying to use a driver it shouldn't causing a lot of problems.
Yea you would be a lot better to use Windows XP. I'm not sure why silverlight and such won't install for you, it works on my old PC.

Windows 7 is better usually, but it takes more resources than Windows Xp so that is part of your problem, but the bigger problem is probably its trying to use a driver it shouldn't causing a lot of problems.
 
Solution

DeanFS

Reputable
Sep 16, 2014
4
0
4,510


Thanks for the tip. silverlight refused to install on windows XP. It cited its minimum requirements. I even looked for old installers to see if that would work. I gave up and installed Win7.
 

DeanFS

Reputable
Sep 16, 2014
4
0
4,510


Actually I should note that I was running Windows XP 64 bit, which seems to have only 1 service pack (which i did install). It refused to install on that.
 
Ahh well Windows XP 64-bit has always been really buggy. You would be better to use 32-bit Windows XP. It will work with the program, and have good performance without conflict. The only thing 64-bit really adds is that it lets you use more than 4GB of RAM. Otherwise the difference is exceptionally small.
 

DeanFS

Reputable
Sep 16, 2014
4
0
4,510


I see. I will add that to the list. Right now I am asking ASUS what they recommend.