Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

g3258 oc temps

Tags:
  • 4G
Last response: in Overclocking
Share
September 16, 2014 8:05:00 PM

hi guys im running now at 4.4g at 1.3v my temps im running prime 95 and my temps are playing with 67-72C and i had a maximum of 74. basically what is the safe temp for this chip? im hoping i can achieve 4.6-4.7g. i have a thermaltake performer 3.0 thanks!

More about : g3258 temps

September 16, 2014 8:17:11 PM

80 C is a safe sustained temperature, average over 20 or so seconds, 90 is acceptable for short (maybe for 1 or 2 seconds) peaks.

If you're having trouble with stability, it is not recommended for you to raise the vCore more. Try downclocking the CPU cache or RAM.
m
0
l
September 16, 2014 8:17:37 PM

they are a bit higher than mine,

my setup msi gaming 7, hyper 212 evo
i did oc to 4.8ghz at 1.441V and when playing battlefield i had 70-80C.

After installed my ram i had some bsod's so i used the oc genie, its now oc at 4.3ghz at 1.325v playing bf4 at 56-57C. Not worth the overlock imo to burn the cpu, also i didnt notice any difrence in fps ingame.

Gpu is gtx 460 1gb if that matters.
Ram is corsair 8gb 2133hz if that matters too. CL9 1.65V
m
0
l
Related resources
September 16, 2014 8:36:46 PM

watafak said:
they are a bit higher than mine,

my setup msi gaming 7, hyper 212 evo
i did oc to 4.8ghz at 1.441V and when playing battlefield i had 70-80C.

After installed my ram i had some bsod's so i used the oc genie, its now oc at 4.3ghz at 1.325v playing bf4 at 56-57C. Not worth the overlock imo to burn the cpu, also i didnt notice any difrence in fps ingame.

Gpu is gtx 460 1gb if that matters.
Ram is corsair 8gb 2133hz if that matters too. CL9 1.65V


well i looking to buy a 270x or 285 so im looking to oc it higher to lower the bottleneck.

m
0
l
September 16, 2014 8:41:28 PM

Alpha3031 said:
80 C is a safe sustained temperature, average over 20 or so seconds, 90 is acceptable for short (maybe for 1 or 2 seconds) peaks.

If you're having trouble with stability, it is not recommended for you to raise the vCore more. Try downclocking the CPU cache or RAM.


well im in prime 95 for almost an hour
now it is playing at 65 70 but i had a maximum of 77. is it safe to assume that prime95 pushes my cpu more than bf4 or any other AAA titles? so if i play temps are lower right?
m
0
l
September 16, 2014 9:40:41 PM

Yes, and Yes. Just by the way, it's a good idea to turn Load Line Calibration off because it may cause dangerous spikes in voltage.
m
0
l
September 16, 2014 9:50:23 PM

watafak said:
they are a bit higher than mine,

my setup msi gaming 7, hyper 212 evo
i did oc to 4.8ghz at 1.441V and when playing battlefield i had 70-80C.

After installed my ram i had some bsod's so i used the oc genie, its now oc at 4.3ghz at 1.325v playing bf4 at 56-57C. Not worth the overlock imo to burn the cpu, also i didnt notice any difrence in fps ingame.

Gpu is gtx 460 1gb if that matters.
Ram is corsair 8gb 2133hz if that matters too. CL9 1.65V


I recommend you run the RAM at reduced clocks and 1.5 V, and also the CPU VCore at or below 1.3 V.
m
0
l
September 17, 2014 2:42:14 AM

Alpha3031 said:
watafak said:
they are a bit higher than mine,

my setup msi gaming 7, hyper 212 evo
i did oc to 4.8ghz at 1.441V and when playing battlefield i had 70-80C.

After installed my ram i had some bsod's so i used the oc genie, its now oc at 4.3ghz at 1.325v playing bf4 at 56-57C. Not worth the overlock imo to burn the cpu, also i didnt notice any difrence in fps ingame.

Gpu is gtx 460 1gb if that matters.
Ram is corsair 8gb 2133hz if that matters too. CL9 1.65V


I recommend you run the RAM at reduced clocks and 1.5 V, and also the CPU VCore at or below 1.3 V.



u may recommend what u want but msi oc genie sets this on auto ;p no offence. I pressed the onboard button OC Genie and voila all this no fussing. :p  ram running at 1.65 via XMP, i think its needed the extra volt to run at 2133hz.
m
0
l
September 17, 2014 8:02:14 PM

Just saying, 1.65 is above Haswell DDR3 specs, and 1.325 VCore is well in to the danger zone.
m
1
l
September 17, 2014 8:21:24 PM

Alpha3031 said:
Just saying, 1.65 is above Haswell DDR3 specs, and 1.325 VCore is well in to the danger zone.


i think it is different on the g3258 because it only has 2 cores? reviews are saying that g3258 is a good overclocking chip than the other i5 series because of it having only 2 cores. it runs cooler, better potential etc etc
m
0
l
September 17, 2014 9:32:22 PM

Anything above 1.3 V is still "only if you need to".
m
0
l
September 17, 2014 10:41:34 PM

Alpha3031 said:
Anything above 1.3 V is still "only if you need to".


hey do you think using the integrated gpu of my chip has an effect to my chip"s oc capabilities im at 4.5 but im at 1.350 volts. can run prime 95 with just 1.345. do you think if i add a gpu that will lessen the burden on my gpu and i can achieve better results?

m
0
l
October 7, 2014 1:10:42 PM

stop ocing crap dual core low end CPU?
m
0
l
October 7, 2014 6:28:21 PM

Lascar said:
stop ocing crap dual core low end CPU?


haters gona hate, amd fan boy....
m
0
l
October 7, 2014 6:43:29 PM

Lascar said:
stop ocing crap dual core low end CPU?


And your suggestion is?
m
0
l
October 8, 2014 1:12:30 AM

watafak said:
Lascar said:
stop ocing crap dual core low end CPU?


haters gona hate, amd fan boy....


sorry douchemista if i stated the obvious. People who want performance dont take dual core even less 3mb cache, or worse 1333 mhz ram architecture. Before spouting moronic stuff like fan boy to annoy people get some experience and learn a bit. Stupid kid.

YES! stupid troll kid, the CPU is crap! Live with it.
m
0
l
October 8, 2014 1:19:23 AM

Alpha3031 said:
Lascar said:
stop ocing crap dual core low end CPU?


And your suggestion is?


Dual core comes out that has nice OC, it was demoed for bench purposes and proposed as an ok budget chip, suddenly everyone starts buying only that and everyone OC OC OC. People OC chips to get way better performance on chips that actually give you better like i5, i7, FX.

Honestly i find it hilarious that people go loco about a CPU that doesnt even give you any plus in real time. So sorry if people dont get my point and call me amd fan boy and as always retards start bashing etc.

In the end, You are just ocing that CPU for the heck of overclocking, not to actually use it properly or actually make use of the OC. What does it matter, squeeze a 50 bucks CPU as much as possible get 5% performance added and use until it burns up. GJ.

And to answer the op question at the same time, There is no safe temp as soon as you play with overclocking. Overclock immediately affects your CPU and mobo and it becomes worse depending on the settings, so please keep overclocking chips that were not designed to be so, and do it because some1 else did it to give benchmarks.

Case closed...

m
0
l
October 8, 2014 1:23:05 AM

vince232 said:
watafak said:
they are a bit higher than mine,

my setup msi gaming 7, hyper 212 evo
i did oc to 4.8ghz at 1.441V and when playing battlefield i had 70-80C.

After installed my ram i had some bsod's so i used the oc genie, its now oc at 4.3ghz at 1.325v playing bf4 at 56-57C. Not worth the overlock imo to burn the cpu, also i didnt notice any difrence in fps ingame.

Gpu is gtx 460 1gb if that matters.
Ram is corsair 8gb 2133hz if that matters too. CL9 1.65V


well i looking to buy a 270x or 285 so im looking to oc it higher to lower the bottleneck.



Since im getting bashed because of my AMD logo, let me tellyou this. You will get bottlenecks no matter that you do. Overclocking with not give you an additional core. Overclocking will not let you do better multitasking. Overclocking will not cancel bottlenecks from games. Overclocking will make your CPU heat up and when you play your games it will be worse and eventually damage your system.

GOOD LUCK
m
0
l
October 8, 2014 2:21:05 AM

Lascar said:
vince232 said:
watafak said:
they are a bit higher than mine,

my setup msi gaming 7, hyper 212 evo
i did oc to 4.8ghz at 1.441V and when playing battlefield i had 70-80C.

After installed my ram i had some bsod's so i used the oc genie, its now oc at 4.3ghz at 1.325v playing bf4 at 56-57C. Not worth the overlock imo to burn the cpu, also i didnt notice any difrence in fps ingame.

Gpu is gtx 460 1gb if that matters.
Ram is corsair 8gb 2133hz if that matters too. CL9 1.65V


well i looking to buy a 270x or 285 so im looking to oc it higher to lower the bottleneck.



Since im getting bashed because of my AMD logo, let me tellyou this. You will get bottlenecks no matter that you do. Overclocking with not give you an additional core. Overclocking will not let you do better multitasking. Overclocking will not cancel bottlenecks from games. Overclocking will make your CPU heat up and when you play your games it will be worse and eventually damage your system.

GOOD LUCK


"Overclocking with not give you an additional core. Overclocking will not let you do better multitasking. Overclocking will not cancel bottlenecks from games" WOW u must have studied rocket science or something to know these stuff.
I enjoy talking with people like u, U amuse me.

About all the crap u said of burn,heat,nuclear launches etc... try reach 4.8/stock cooler/ at 80C on ur cpu. U cant, u have a six core. That is the whole purpose of this cpu. UNLOCKED>buy it>OC it>have sort of equal performance with i5-i7 even on BF4. i5-i7 are by far superior cpu's than this midget. When people wanna have budget gaming system, they will go with this one. (q3 budget system build by tomshardware)

Cant wait for ur reply and also please define me this " Overclocking will make your CPU heat up and when you play your games it will be worse" cause when i did the oc i saw 10fps up. "stupid troll kid" manners are real
m
0
l
October 8, 2014 3:20:14 AM

watafak said:
Lascar said:
vince232 said:
watafak said:
they are a bit higher than mine,

my setup msi gaming 7, hyper 212 evo
i did oc to 4.8ghz at 1.441V and when playing battlefield i had 70-80C.

After installed my ram i had some bsod's so i used the oc genie, its now oc at 4.3ghz at 1.325v playing bf4 at 56-57C. Not worth the overlock imo to burn the cpu, also i didnt notice any difrence in fps ingame.

Gpu is gtx 460 1gb if that matters.
Ram is corsair 8gb 2133hz if that matters too. CL9 1.65V


well i looking to buy a 270x or 285 so im looking to oc it higher to lower the bottleneck.



Since im getting bashed because of my AMD logo, let me tellyou this. You will get bottlenecks no matter that you do. Overclocking with not give you an additional core. Overclocking will not let you do better multitasking. Overclocking will not cancel bottlenecks from games. Overclocking will make your CPU heat up and when you play your games it will be worse and eventually damage your system.

GOOD LUCK


"Overclocking with not give you an additional core. Overclocking will not let you do better multitasking. Overclocking will not cancel bottlenecks from games" WOW u must have studied rocket science or something to know these stuff.
I enjoy talking with people like u, U amuse me.

About all the crap u said of burn,heat,nuclear launches etc... try reach 4.8/stock cooler/ at 80C on ur cpu. U cant, u have a six core. That is the whole purpose of this cpu. UNLOCKED>buy it>OC it>have sort of equal performance with i5-i7 even on BF4. i5-i7 are by far superior cpu's than this midget. When people wanna have budget gaming system, they will go with this one. (q3 budget system build by tomshardware)

Cant wait for ur reply and also please define me this " Overclocking will make your CPU heat up and when you play your games it will be worse" cause when i did the oc i saw 10fps up. "stupid troll kid" manners are real


Sorry the AMD fanboy does not have to argue with ignorant kid like you nor do i have time to teach you. If you have time to spout random nonsense without learning anything, surely you can better utilize this time to go learn a few things.
Good bye ignorant child, keep running your CPU at 80c for 10 fps, while i run my CPU at 40 without even having to do anything for 4 years. It is sad that people like you who are extremely ignorant dare bash others randomly just to feel superior when all you are doing is proving that you dnt know anything. You are running 4 core game on a dual core without bottleneck? go lie to someone else, maybe your kindergarten friends.
m
0
l
October 8, 2014 5:04:26 AM

Replying to me makes me happy pal. I am a kid after all. I will keep running my cpu at 80c for 10fps cause I CAN. Also who said i am not bottleneckin?
also if ur cpu runs bf4 at 40C on stock cooling ill go killmyself.
Keep the chat going, me and my kindergarten friends are w8ing here with pop corns! cheers!
m
0
l
October 8, 2014 10:04:59 PM

Let's just clear something up, bottlenecks will always be present in any system. The performance of the pentium is much better than the equivalent amd and is good for low budget gaming. And to correct your reply, as soon as you open the box on your cpu,it starts dying. Don't start using last quarters budget build, the g3258 wasn't out then
m
0
l
!