Darkbreeze,
All of your criticisms of my build seem to be based on a hypothetical where the build is intended for you and not the OP.
---------
N200:
The N200 is exceptionally well suited to the build that I have placed inside of it, a build with very low power dissipation and a small footprint. Your list of flaws about the case (many of which are inaccurate or irrelevant), is a list of "flaws" that would apply to ANY case that is SMALL (microATX). It's like complaining about the ground clearance of a sedan or the fuel economy of an SUV. Different tools for different purposes with different tradeoffs. The upside to the N200 is that it is small. The downside, is that it is not well suited to a fire breathing overclocked FX-8350 rig with dual GPUs, water loops, and a 1.2KW PSU. You're holding the N200 to a standard that need not apply as your standard of what makes a good computer case for your machine is not relevant here. I happen to like my big fat Fractal Core 3500 (i need to update my profile/rigs as I'm running an 8350 in a 3500 now), but I know that such a case is pointless for a build that can fit comfortably in a microATX case.
Considering the goals of the build given by the OP, I find it hard to understand how ANY of your criticisms of a microATX tower here are applicable. A microATX build is perfectly suitable for single GPU builds up to ~500-700W worth of total power dissipation in well designed cases like the N200. Speaking of well designed:
Here's the N200 pictured next to some "mid towers."
Here's the inside of the N200, with 4x120mm case fans installed (including the side fan) with a CM T4 on the FX-6300 in there, and room for a 5th 120mm fan up front (1 of 2 installed on the front). Decent cable management is possible behind the tray (including the big fat ATX power cable).
The SATA power connectors "dangling" are because this machine is waiting for some drives to be completed. It is an FX-6300 + HD7870XT and the case provides plenty of cooling with 4 low RPM fans to run furmark/Prime95 together indefinitely, even with the CPU overclocked to ~4.4ghz. (That's over 400W of combined thermal dissipation).
FYI: The case has room for a 240mm raditator up front, and a 120mm radiator in the back, though I really don't see the point. I have run pumped-liquid cooling systems before and was not impressed. There isn't an upside to it unless you're pushing for competition level overclocks that would never be practical for daily use anyway. In my experience, decibel for decibel and size for size, heat-pipe coolers and liquid coolers offer very nearly the same cooling potential, so the only way for the pumped-liquid cooling option to have any advantage over heat-pipes is if the radiators grow to a sophisticated system with more surface area than a heatpipe cooler can support hanging over the CPU. At that point, you'll have more money in cooling than in the CPU itself. At that point the build is a novelty, so any argument about a case needing to support such a configuration, is ultimately a defense of the impractical/pointless/novelties. I can have all the impractical pointless novelties I want in my computer (including a tiny little red button on the back that does nothing, just to screw with people), but I'm not going to get on a forum and pedal build ideas built around them without disclosing that there is a novelty aspect to the philosophy for a particular argument I am making.
In fact, the N200 is one of the finest cases in it's class ($40-50 microATX form factor). You're comparing it to an $80 mid-tower and complaining about everything that is effected by SIZE. Bigger is only better if the space is going to be used for something.
---------------
GTX750Ti,
Within the realm of modern GPUs, there is no such thing as being "weak" on performance, only on visual quality. The GTX750Ti can play any game made at 60FPS, just with less visual quality than something like an R9 280 or GTX770. Performance does not originate with the GPU, visual quality does. If you're an ultra-settings snob, then the bottleneck is not the CPU or the GPU, it's the stubborn captain occupying the space between the keyboard and the chair. If you're practical about the limitations of the GPU selected for a build, and select visual quality settings that are appropriate for the GPU, then any game can be enjoyed without a performance related problem on any modern GPU from ~$100+.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7764/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-750-ti-and-gtx-750-review-maxwell/14
Most games at medium quality settings are doing just fine on the GTX750Ti. If you're playing for the view, then I encourage you to go for a hike, the real world is still more beautiful. If you're playing for the gameplay, for the competition, for the storyline, etc, then the graphical settings shouldn't matter all that much to you.
---------------
Your build will now be critically examined and I will now moan about all the nit picks I see wrong with it. (I'm not going to sit here and let you tear into my build with a bunch of nonsense, and not return the favor).
To-the-door cost is the most important price tag people are interested in. Posting a build that misrepresents itself by nearly $100 in to-the-door costs is isn't very helpful IMO.
The OP mentioned no interest in overclocking. The Xeon offers the same execution performance in video editing as an overclocked i5, with no overclocking required.
Having a chipset that can overclock is meaningless if board isn't built for it. You've selected a Z97 board with 3-phase CPU power. That's a cruel joke, far worse than the ASRock board I have selected, which offers overbuilt VRMs for a chipset not intended for overclocking.
Ripjaw X 4GB dimms are configured with only 8x8 bit components, (single rank). They will perform worse than slower kits configured dual rank (16x8 bit components). The ballistix kit is better.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram