Gtx 970 sli Bottleneck

Solution
Yes it certainly will bottleneck. That CPU is the older and MUCH worse revision of the 8xxx CPUs. The 8350 would be ok, but the 8120 will definitely bottleneck in games where the CPU is heavily taxed.

Bill Stevenson

Reputable
Sep 22, 2014
4
0
4,510
If im gaming on a single (for now) 1080p monitor on ultra could i get away with my current cpu until around January without any major performance hits and would you recommend the FX 9370?
 
Get a single 970. It will easily max ANY game at 1080p. It beats the gtx780. Using two will show ZERO improvement over one card at 1080p.

NO I DO NOT recommend the 9370. It is junk. It is a marketing gimmick that doesn't stay cool and is not stable at all. You need a $45 cooler to even run it at stock clocks.
 

Bill Stevenson

Reputable
Sep 22, 2014
4
0
4,510
What AMD cpu would u reccomend for a dual card setup because i eventually want to get a 4k monitor and want to be able to do 4k gaming and i cant afford a new board for an Intel cpu cause I will be out of money after the 2 cards and cpu
 

Kohwali

Reputable
Jun 15, 2014
1,037
0
5,660
I think you should just balance out that money instead of throwing it all at dual 970s. Just get one 970 and either upgrade the CPU or save up and upgrade the CPU + mobo. The price of 4K monitors are rapidly dropping, so the longer you hold out, the more money you'll save.
 

Misterzen

Reputable
Oct 3, 2014
1
0
4,510
Sorry you are beeing silly, "get an amd 8350 then oc it"??? you realize the 9370 is a binned 8350 thats factory ocd? the 8350 with oc will use atleast as much power as a 9370 and get as hot or hotter due to possibly beeing a worse chip that cant handle the frequency.
 

danco5074

Honorable
Feb 6, 2014
115
0
10,710


What are your displays? if you are playing one monitor 1080 @ 60Hz, only get one (a second one will be a waste of money since you will be around max FPS on ultra and full AA anyway. $300+ is not worth the extra 5 FPS to get from 55 to 60 in all games).

If you're at 1440p there will not be much of a bottleneck, because the higher resolution makes a strong dependency on GPUs. If you are only using a 60Hz 1440p I would only get one 970 as well. You only need two in order to get over 60FPS which a 60Hz monitor is incapable of. If you got a 1440p that can get to 100Hz, go for it.

If you are messing with three monitors and combine all screens with one application, the 2 would be ideal, and you will probably get a bottle neck, should still stay at 60FPS, so not too much worry.
 


I do not agree here at all. In what games are you seeing a bottleneck, and what are your CPU and GPU usages?
 

danco5074

Honorable
Feb 6, 2014
115
0
10,710


I highly doubt that. What are you playing? I have a r9 290 with a FX 8320 OC'd to 4.2GHz. It benches about 5% less than an i-5.
 

Muashi

Reputable
Dec 29, 2014
5
0
4,510

yeah because they have poorly optimized it in the bios, its still the same chip duh.