Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

GTX 970 G1 Gaming - Performance issues.

Tags:
  • Gtx
  • Gaming
  • Graphics
  • Performance
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
September 25, 2014 4:16:29 PM

Hey guys.

I reviced my two GTX 970 G1 Gaming(Really good looking cards, and damn they run quiet att 80% even) and i have a problem with performance.

First of, i ran a custom fan curve and got 67C on the top card on 80% fan speed. And 60C on the bottom card. Is that normal temps?

But to my main question. I ran Firestrike(free with demo) and only got 17000 in score. I know this is not normal. Do you guys have any idea what the problem is? Also i got a bit over 2600 on Heven bench on 1080P Ultra 8xaa and Extreme tess.

More about : gtx 970 gaming performance issues

a b 4 Gaming
September 25, 2014 8:47:42 PM

The temps are alright. The scores are impressive. 17k in Firestrike is in the upper tier, mate. Look up for verified scores here:
http://www.3dmark.com/search#/?mode=advanced&url=/proxy... GeForce GTX 970&cpuName=Intel Core i7-4770K

If you're not using Hexa core i7, those scores are great.

Same with Heaven, the scores are impressive, 2.6k is the normal SLI score with i7 and SLI 780 Ti.
m
0
l
September 26, 2014 12:56:57 AM

Sorry mate i forgot to mention that i meant GPU score. Not total score. So 17k in GPU score and 13k in total. This looks a bit low computer to other getting 22k plus with the same hardware.
m
0
l
Related resources
a b 4 Gaming
September 26, 2014 3:15:05 AM

Nothing much I can differenciate, all others above you have the Drivers approved by FutureMark, have you updated the GPU drivers to the latest available? Can you OC the CPU further to ~4.5GHz?
m
0
l
September 26, 2014 5:46:48 AM

I would like to skip that so i don't have to increase the voltage.
m
0
l
a b 4 Gaming
September 26, 2014 5:48:24 AM

Do you have the latest GPU drivers?
m
0
l
September 26, 2014 5:58:07 AM

344.16. I Think thats the newest
m
0
l
a b 4 Gaming
September 26, 2014 6:03:59 AM

Yep they're the newest drivers, nothing much which's out of order it seems. Try retesting.
m
0
l
!