eMachines EL 1200-05W CPU upgrade

hatrack71

Reputable
Mar 11, 2014
11
0
4,510
Hi guys and gals. Want to upgrade the processor in this cheapie desktop as a machine in a spare bedroom. It works well but the processor is a bit slow. It currently has an AMD 2650e which uses the AM2 socket and has a speed of 1.6G single core. I upgraded the RAM to show 2.75G instead of the stock 1G. That helped.

I am looking at the Athlon X2 3800+ AM2 processor. The eMachines specs claim the motherboard will handle up to 45W and the X2 3800+ is a 35W processor. Seems doable and I would most likely see if I can update the BIOS first. The question is has anyone tried this and does it work? It seems doable and the cpus can be had all day long for under $10 shipped to me. :^) Also, I love the small form factor of this PC and would love to make it just a tad more usable. This is running Windows XP Professional.

I know many will say it isn't worth doing but I want to keep this PC and make it the best it can be and stop. I don't want to get too carried away though. So, anyway..
 
Solution
You can't "make it the best it can be and then stop" without being carried away. Right now it's probably just you wanting to tinker with it, it does not make technical or financial sense. The processor you want to use (Athlon X2 3800+ AM2) seems to be 4 years older than the current processor - Regardless of rated speed, I cannot see how that can be any form of improvement.

I admit that the benchmarks seem to indicate that your proposed "upgrade" is faster. Their dating of the processor is also more recent that Cpu-World.com =77&cmp[]=184]http://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=77&cmp[]=184

However, they rate it at 98W,

It may be that the numbers or data is just off and you have the right information. However, it still does not make...
You can't "make it the best it can be and then stop" without being carried away. Right now it's probably just you wanting to tinker with it, it does not make technical or financial sense. The processor you want to use (Athlon X2 3800+ AM2) seems to be 4 years older than the current processor - Regardless of rated speed, I cannot see how that can be any form of improvement.

I admit that the benchmarks seem to indicate that your proposed "upgrade" is faster. Their dating of the processor is also more recent that Cpu-World.com =77&cmp[]=184]http://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=77&cmp[]=184

However, they rate it at 98W,

It may be that the numbers or data is just off and you have the right information. However, it still does not make sense to even spend the $35 to buy the upgrade CPU.
 
Solution
For a large number of years now Intel CPUs (and AMD for that matter, but I'm more familiar with Intel since I've not had or built with AMD since about 1999) has shown a performance increase that was not related to the CPU speed. That link to CPU-World, for instance, says the rated speed of the processor is 3800_, but the "real" speed is 2000. I can't even begin to explain that.