As you can see, AMD doesn't have anything that Tom's feels is competitive with any Intel i5 or i7 CPU's beyond the Gulftown range. Which makes sense, because the Bulldozer line was designed to compete with Gulftown, but was delayed. This is the major reason why AMD keeps getting further and further behind in the enthusiast market. Intel is coming out with newer and better stuff based on superior architecture, while AMD is stuck tweaking and rebranding an architecture that was inferior when it released 4 years ago.
actually its the price the mayor difference amd its cheaper but much faster but the downfall its that it overheats fast and its a bit les durable if not keep well. check this link so you decide this is the intel i7 4770K vs the AMD FX 9590
actually its the price the mayor difference amd its cheaper but much faster but the downfall its that it overheats fast and its a bit les durable if not keep well. check this link so you decide this is the intel i7 4770K vs the AMD FX 9590
The FX 9590 is just a overclocked 8350 that does not really perform much better and has HORRIBLE thermals.
As you can see, AMD doesn't have anything that Tom's feels is competitive with any Intel i5 or i7 CPU's beyond the Gulftown range. Which makes sense, because the Bulldozer line was designed to compete with Gulftown, but was delayed. This is the major reason why AMD keeps getting further and further behind in the enthusiast market. Intel is coming out with newer and better stuff based on superior architecture, while AMD is stuck tweaking and rebranding an architecture that was inferior when it released 4 years ago.