COD Advanced Warfare VS BattleField Hardline

Yazan Zaid

Reputable
Feb 19, 2014
290
0
4,790
Which should i get this november?i dont care about SP so much, i just care more about MP, GAMEPLAY, CONTENTS AND GRAPHICS.
So which should i get?
 
Solution
Well, for what it matters, here's my "two cents"...

Got BF3 off Origin when it was "on the house" and BC/BC2 on consoles which I eventually gave in as second hand for discounts, and they were fun, but the play style felt too static compared to CoD. I mean, OK, CoD has camping, but BF pushes it; it does it correctly, although, as it punishes you for being careless and just rushing head on towards the enemy's spawn point (as it should really be, meaning you can't just tank a full clip and knife your opponent). Nevertheless, they were good games, with BC's campaign being ridiculously fun, and all of them worth playing. Subsequently got my hands on BF4 by trying it at a friend's house, and there's pretty much nothing new under the sun over...

Vynavill

Honorable
Well, for what it matters, here's my "two cents"...

Got BF3 off Origin when it was "on the house" and BC/BC2 on consoles which I eventually gave in as second hand for discounts, and they were fun, but the play style felt too static compared to CoD. I mean, OK, CoD has camping, but BF pushes it; it does it correctly, although, as it punishes you for being careless and just rushing head on towards the enemy's spawn point (as it should really be, meaning you can't just tank a full clip and knife your opponent). Nevertheless, they were good games, with BC's campaign being ridiculously fun, and all of them worth playing. Subsequently got my hands on BF4 by trying it at a friend's house, and there's pretty much nothing new under the sun over its predecessor, except sniper rifle bullets looking slightly less like huge shooting stars, highgly destructible enviroinments (BC already had that, but BF4 literally levels entire areas) and enemy marking mechanics.
Hardline is literally "BF4 goes Payday", nothing more, nothing less, so it's not worth it IMO, unless you're a die-hard fan of the series.

Played almost all CoDs from the series, with their ups and downs for each episode's MP issues or miracles. To state examples with some of the latest episodes:
- I could play BO2, but I'm sick of getting called a cheater when I'm not one just because I know the usual camping spots (and, with some common sense, can pretty much predict where and when someone will pop their head out of those places).
- I could play MW3, but MP is terribad there.
- I'm currently playing Ghosts every now and then, but the low playerbase due to the game's port being an utter "pile of steaming biological waste" brings in so much lag it hurts...
AW is kinda my last hope for a slightly more fast-paced shooter on PC, hoping that the engine change made by Sledgehammer provides access to a better codebase, and not just more eye-candy. I'd buy the new UT, but seen how the last UT3 turned out, I wouldn't put too much faith in it :p

I'm getting AW, possibly for PC, but if things turn out to be like Ghosts (terrible launch phase which scares away most of the playerbase), I'd rather get the console version and be done with it. I'm horrible at FPS games with joypads, but at least there will be more than 3k players max on weekend afternoons...
 
Solution