Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Optimal 3Dmark Physics score

Tags:
  • Intel i7
  • Intel
  • Graphics
  • Benchmark
  • Sandy Bridge
  • Geforce
  • Nvidia
September 30, 2014 2:32:40 PM


I've been testing on 3Dmark Firestrike and a bit on trial 3Dmark11. I got a 980 recently, so obviously I'm exited to see it spread it's wings, since 3Dmark is one of the only programmes I have that really puts any pressure on it so far. I know it's synthetic, I heard all the talk, but I'm curious about my Physics score. I'm using an i7-2700k at it's stock settings (3.5ghz and 3.9ghz turbo). First, I see people with 13,000+ physics scores. Are these users that have Overclocked quite a bit? It is hard to tell because 3Dmark doesn't do a very good job of saying if they are or not. What is a normal Physics score for a 2700k with a 980? A few sites I found put it at 8500 but I call bs (site: http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i7-3820-vs-Intel-Cor... - this for real???). I'm running stock and I'm getting 9400 on 11 (Performance) and 10040 on Firestike. Second, how is my score compared to, let's say a 4770k? I saw a few benchmarks with 9200 on 11, but a massive amount of results I looked up put the Physics score of 4770ks at around 11000. Is this because of Overclocking as well?

People with a 4770k or 3770k please post scores, I would like to compare. Is my 2700k on league with them or is it slow?

Result(s): http://www.3dmark.com/fs/2820285 (Firestrike)

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/8771622 (11 Performance)

More about : optimal 3dmark physics score

!