I am planning on buying a graphics card, since now I have integrated Intel HD graphics (Pentium G3420 3.2GHz processor - http://ark.intel.com/products/77775/Intel-Pentium-Processor-G3420-3M-Cache-3_20-GHz ).
Is the 200MHz difference of graphics processor between the two noticeable/worth paying additional 40 euro. All their other specs are the same (2GB memory, 256bit interface, 5600MHz memory tact(?), etc).
Monitor resolution is 1920x1080.
I will mostly use it for gaming.
First: MSI Radeon R9 270 2GB GDDR5 R9 270 GAMING 2G (900 MHz)
Price goes around 160-175 euro.
Second: MSI Radeon R9 270X 2GB GDDR5 R9 270X HAWK (1100 MHz)
Price goes around 200-215 euro.
Also, will the processor bottleneck them? If so, can I go for Radeon R7 graphics cards (will those get bottleneck), if they are worth it, considering that they are only 10-20 euros cheaper?
Sorry if something is unclear, I'm kind of bad at explaining what I want
Is the 200MHz difference of graphics processor between the two noticeable/worth paying additional 40 euro. All their other specs are the same (2GB memory, 256bit interface, 5600MHz memory tact(?), etc).
Monitor resolution is 1920x1080.
I will mostly use it for gaming.
First: MSI Radeon R9 270 2GB GDDR5 R9 270 GAMING 2G (900 MHz)
Price goes around 160-175 euro.
Second: MSI Radeon R9 270X 2GB GDDR5 R9 270X HAWK (1100 MHz)
Price goes around 200-215 euro.
Also, will the processor bottleneck them? If so, can I go for Radeon R7 graphics cards (will those get bottleneck), if they are worth it, considering that they are only 10-20 euros cheaper?
Sorry if something is unclear, I'm kind of bad at explaining what I want