Keiji Takahashi :
thanks for your help but can you explain to me why y pick 4690 over 4690k?
and for the GPU i think MSI and GIGABYTE better than EVGA isnt it? plus i got the MSI on hand rt now :d lucky me
but i really appreciated your help sir
If you already have a GPU, then no need to get another one. The MSI card should be just fine.
For CPUs, I usually don't look at CPUs from the perspective of OC'ing; I picked the 4590 for that reason. If you're going to OC, then the 4690k will do great. I haven't seen enough testing to conclude an OC'ed i5 is really merited for gaming (yet), but take your pick. If you really want to OC, or you'll be doing more than just gaming, then it's worth the $40. I just haven't seen enough hard evidence that supports OC'ing the i5 for gaming. In fact, I just was looking to see where the sweet spot for a gaming CPU would be, and it turns out Tom's released an article in Setpember about this topic-
Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: September 2014 (Performance per Dollar page). The 4430 that was tested had this said about it, "Frankly, if value is an important consideration, there's little reason to spend $180 on a Core i5-4430... unless you want to overclock it for a better experience in some of your other apps." The 4590 will do you fine, and the 4690k (which was tested in that review) yielded no significant improvements over the 4430. The 4590 will give you just about the same performance as the 4690k (at stock clock speeds), but with lesser OC capabilities (the 4590 has a locked multiplier). You might want to look into a different MoBo if you want to OC the 4590, though; just an FYI.
Pick what will suit your needs the best. If you want to have better OC capabilities, just in case, then go with the 4690k. If you are only going to use it for gaming, and won't be doing other hardware demanding tasks, then you're best off going with the 4590, and spending that $40 on a game... or beer. I'd pick beer.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram