AMD 8370E/8320E vs. FX 6300 vs. FX 6100 for video encoding

smitbret

Distinguished
Aug 5, 2002
768
0
19,060
Been using the FX 6100 as the CPU in my WHS 2011 server. It's mostly used for server media and basic storage. However, it does see some regular duty in transcoding/re-encoding video files and it can struggle to transcode real-time full Blu-Ray rips especially to multiple devices simultaneously.

I am not really interested in doing much more than just dropping a new CPU into the same motherboard since the server functions fine; video encoding is just borderline and for $100-$150 it would be nice if I could get a 20-30% and still stay at a TDP of 95W. I had been considering just grabbing an FX 6300 while they are ~$100 at NewEgg, but $50 for 2 more cores seems like an interesting proposition.

Anyone got opinions on how the newer 8320E/8370E 8-core CPUs perform compared to an FX-6100?
 
Solution
33% increase in core count, 10-15% increase in IPC. ~50% is not an unreasonable estimate for the better end of the scale in some conditions.

smitbret

Distinguished
Aug 5, 2002
768
0
19,060


50% faster is pretty optimistic from my research, but basically I was looking for confirmation that the 8320e would be at least 25% faster and everything seems to be pointing to that as a realistic expectation. Guess I'll grab one and throw the FX 6100 up on eBay for cheap.
 


On average I would expect 25% with higher peaks.
 

smitbret

Distinguished
Aug 5, 2002
768
0
19,060


Right on. Kind of makes it a no-brainer at this point. Thanks for the info, guys.