Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Intel Core Quad Q6600 Performance

Tags:
  • intel core q6600
  • Core
  • q6600
  • Intel
  • CPUs
  • Quad
Last response: in CPUs
Share
October 15, 2014 4:53:58 PM

Hi, i have Computer.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 560
4GB RAM
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4ghz

if i overclock Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4ghz to 3.4ghz, Which have same performance with Q6600 3.4ghz ??? My friend say q6600 3.2ghz have peformance like AMD FX 4100.... yes true? Thanks for anwser :) 

More about : intel core quad q6600 performance

October 15, 2014 5:53:50 PM

Maybe this can help a bit...

My old q6600@3.4 have half the performance of a 4770@stock in the "Cinebench 11.5" test (is a test very similar to rendering in 3D Studio MAX).

It gives me 3.84 points and the 4770 gives about 8 points.

You can search for Cinebench 11.5 JPGs in google for more information.
m
0
l
October 15, 2014 6:37:38 PM

= q6600 3.4 ghz is bad or good? im not english :)  i dont understand you :D  :) 
m
0
l
Related resources
a c 230 à CPUs
October 15, 2014 7:11:04 PM

A Q6600 @ 3.4 GHz puts you a bit better than a Q9650, which was about on par with a Phenom II 955 which comes in close to a FX 4100.

Now, this doesn't mean that a Q6600@3.4GHz is good by today's standards, but it will do. My 955 is still chugging along adequately, but there are definitely certain scenarios where it isn't up to the task anymore and would get thrashed by a modern i5 or i7.
m
0
l
October 15, 2014 7:29:47 PM

The Q6600 came out 7 years ago... today, it is considered low-end. You can get much better processors for around $100.

It's still a good processor if it's still working for you, but if your computer dies then I would build a new computer.
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
October 15, 2014 8:42:42 PM

3.4GHz is a very high overclock for a Q6600. I would guess that 3.0-3.1 is more normal for most chips and boards although
hitting 3.2 isn't terribly uncommon.
m
0
l
!