Obviously, the more drives the better, when it comes to avoiding complete system loss in the event of a failed drive.
However, it's not always cost-effective to buy many smaller capacity drives (in the case of acceptable format times and whatnot) in the place of one drive of equal capacity.
In my situation, I have two SSDs acting as an OS and specialized drive, respectively. For the usual media, games, less intensive programs, it's obviously gonna be (a) HDD. I was going with a 3TB cap, for now.
For me, is it smart to leave it (the 5% chance of failure) between a 2TB and 1TB, or go for inverse-broke with 3x 1TB drives?
Also, should I bother going RAID, even though only one drive will really be used to projects and such?
However, it's not always cost-effective to buy many smaller capacity drives (in the case of acceptable format times and whatnot) in the place of one drive of equal capacity.
In my situation, I have two SSDs acting as an OS and specialized drive, respectively. For the usual media, games, less intensive programs, it's obviously gonna be (a) HDD. I was going with a 3TB cap, for now.
For me, is it smart to leave it (the 5% chance of failure) between a 2TB and 1TB, or go for inverse-broke with 3x 1TB drives?
Also, should I bother going RAID, even though only one drive will really be used to projects and such?