How well would this pc preform?

Solution
This will be substantially faster, faster GFX, faster CPU in gaming / media creation, faster memory timings and $50 back in ya pocket

CPU comparison here:

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1320?vs=1260

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel Core i7-4790K 4.0GHz Quad-Core Processor ($309.99 @ Amazon)
CPU Cooler: Swiftech H320 55.0 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler ($150.76 @ NCIX US)
Motherboard: MSI Z97-GD65 Gaming ATX LGA1150 Motherboard ($162.99 @ Amazon)
Memory: G.Skill Trident X Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR3-2400 Memory ($174.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: Samsung 840 EVO 500GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($229.99 @ Amazon)
Video...
Not as good as a much less expensive Z97 system..... X99 only really helps in gaming if you have 3 GFX cards or more ... and you'd really want at least a 5930k to bother w/ X99

The Nepton, like all other CLCs, has been rendered irrelevant.

1000 watts is kinda big ....

The 970 is 12% faster than the 290

Ya want CUDA (Nvidia) for editing video

You need 4 sticks of DDR4 RAM for X99
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130794&cm_re=MSI_X99-_-13-130-794-_-Product

Number of Memory Slots = 8×288pin

Memory Standard = DDR4 3333(OC) / 3110(OC) / 3000(OC) / 2750(OC) / 2666(OC) / 2600(OC) / 2400(OC) / 2200(OC) / 2133

I be back in a bit with a faster build
 
This will be substantially faster, faster GFX, faster CPU in gaming / media creation, faster memory timings and $50 back in ya pocket

CPU comparison here:

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1320?vs=1260

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel Core i7-4790K 4.0GHz Quad-Core Processor ($309.99 @ Amazon)
CPU Cooler: Swiftech H320 55.0 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler ($150.76 @ NCIX US)
Motherboard: MSI Z97-GD65 Gaming ATX LGA1150 Motherboard ($162.99 @ Amazon)
Memory: G.Skill Trident X Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR3-2400 Memory ($174.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: Samsung 840 EVO 500GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($229.99 @ Amazon)
Video Card: MSI GeForce GTX 970 4GB Twin Frozr V Video Card ($349.99 @ B&H)
Case: Phanteks Enthoo Pro ATX Full Tower Case ($109.99 @ Amazon)
Power Supply: EVGA 750W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply ($89.99 @ NCIX US)
Optical Drive: Asus DRW-24B1ST/BLK/B/AS DVD/CD Writer ($19.98 @ OutletPC)
Total: $1598.67
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2014-10-17 21:17 EDT-0400

The Swiftech H320 in above list is just a placeholder for the Swiftech H240X which makes all CLCs irrelevant
http://www.swiftech.com/H240-X.aspx

b2.jpg


http://www.hitechlegion.com/reviews/cooling/liquid/40870-swiftech-h220-x-open-loop-240mm-cpu-cooler-review?showall=&start=3

In terms of performance, well….we could simply leave it at the fact that the H220X is simply the best performing out-of-the-box cooler you can buy today. Period. It slightly betters its predecessor, the H220, as well as the Glacer 240L that is equipped with far more powerful and louder fans. The NZXT X60/61 comes close in terms of performance, but at the expense of far more noise and far less compatibility. 240mm CLCs can’t touch the H220X in all out performance, and at tolerable noise levels the H220X flat out embarrasses them. The Cryorig R1 and Noctua NH-D15 come closest in matching the H220X in terms of performance and noise, but fall short. What more can you say? We put the best out of the box solutions up against the H220X, and the H220X walked away a clear winner and did so with absolutely astonishing performance to noise. With all of this performance the H220X never topped 40 dB at full speed.

While the wait for the H220X after the tease at CES seemed like a lifetime, there is no doubt it was worth the wait. Frankly, given the quality and performance here, there is no doubt that forcing this redesign by pulling the H220 off the shelves was a blessing to consumers. Even if it only meant getting the Apogee XL included, the performance and aesthetic benefits of that alone are huge. The result of this redesign makes the H220X the best performing cooler that is install ready right out of the box. There is not a 240mm CLC or air cooler that can beat it, and it does it at 20+ dB quieter than the competing CLCs. To sum it up; the H220X offers better performance, lower noise, better aesthetics, flawless design and build, better components and the option of expandability when compared to a CLC. Putting it gently, choosing any CLC over the H220X would be doing yourself a huge disservice.

 
Solution

laptop-

Reputable
Aug 10, 2014
105
0
4,680
How will a quad core be better for editing and rendering video vs a 6 core with hyper threading and ddr4 vs ddr3 for editing I don't see how that's better than my build
 

laptop-

Reputable
Aug 10, 2014
105
0
4,680
And I used the comparison link you gave me and the difference in gaming with my gragraphic card and yours was only lilike 5 fps which the human eye can't even pick up and the 290 rendered video faster than the 970 and so did the 6 core processor vs the 4690k
 

laptop-

Reputable
Aug 10, 2014
105
0
4,680
Oh and also didn't mention that I compared my ssd vs the one you suggested and mine was faster and has 12 more gb of storage and the reason for a 1000w power supply is future proofing
 


1. Ya didn't have quad channel memory in the quad channel Motherboard...so add another $225 to ya cost for 2 more of those sticks or add $45 for a correct 4 x 4GB set

2. Oops, my mistake, that shoulda been a 4790k ....bad click on my part .... I did select the 4790k (w/ Hyperthreading) on the anadtech link, did you look at that ? I will go back and fix that.

Here it is again.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1320?vs=1260

SYSmark 2014 - Media Creation
Score in SYSmarks (Higher is Better)

5820k = 2167
4790k = 2370

That's a 10% advantage to the 4790k

3. As for the card, lets not forget that, besides the speed advantage, that the 290 also requires 50+% more power, creates 50+% more heat, has very small overclocking headroom due to having been aggressively overclocked before it gets put in the box, and cuts into the "future proofing" as it requires 90 watts more per card

And..... the R290 does NOT have CUDA.... if you looking at DDR4 and X99 to improve video editing, that doesn't "jive" with not taking advantage of CUDA. The non CUDA card rendering faster than a CUDA card ? No. not gonna happen. Open CL has shrunken the gap but is still quite a bit away from catching CUDA. AMD has decent gaming cards and is very good at mining.... CAD, Rendering, Video... nvidia has it locked up.

4. As for the future proofing, CPUs and GFX cards are using less power generation to generation, at least nVidia is.... 980s for example use less than 2/3 the power of 780s.... DC uses 84 watts / SB used 95 watts. In future, needs will be less. Since CF on two 290s uses 180 watts, yes you would need close to a 1000 watt PSU..... But two 970s needs just 750.