Fans amount and positioning

dmovsho

Honorable
Apr 4, 2012
19
0
10,520
Hey guys,
So I've bought a new PC, and was wondering about the fans.
I've read quite a lot about it in the past two days, buy couldn't find the most simple thing - how many fans should I put in (which is very individual after all).

My case is Corsair 300R windowed (http://www.corsair.com/en/carbide-series-300r-windowed-compact-pc-gaming-case)
I have 2 corsair fans (came with the case) - 1x140mm front intake, 1x120mm rear exhaust,
And 1 CPU-Fan (hyper 212x).
and would like to know if that's enough or not.
I'm not planning on overclocking (besides the GPU which is stock overlocked), but I will play games for long sessions.

Dust-wise - my computer is in the corner of the room, about 7cm above the floor, and next to a wall on the fan-opening side of the computer (about 10cm from the wall).
I don't really care about the noise (as long as it's bearable).

The rest of the build is:
PSU - Seasonic g650
CPU - i5 4690
GPU - Sapphire Radeon 280x
1 HDD (WD 1TB Caviar Blue)
1 SSD (128GB Crucial MX100)
12GB RAM (4GB Corsair Vengence, 8GB G.Skill Ripjaw)
 
Solution
Reason you can't find a simple answer - there isn't one.

I recall hearing a rule of thumb that for every 10C hotter a CPU/part runs - it halves the lifespan.

If you are in a very well conrolled climate with 20C ambient air all the time and aren't worried about maximizing the lifespan of yor parts - the two stock case fans is probably fine.

If you live in the auzzie outback, no AC, so the ambient air gets 35+ and you want to maximize the life of the parts - you need TONS of additional airflow in the case.

Personally, I would leave it as stock for now but after a month or so of use would do some temperature monitoring and if the CPU/GPU/system temps are higher than you would like I would then buy a second 140mm (or 120) fan for the...

Dark Lord of Tech

Retired Moderator
2a5ye6b.png
 

menetlaus

Distinguished
Jul 19, 2007
683
0
19,360
Reason you can't find a simple answer - there isn't one.

I recall hearing a rule of thumb that for every 10C hotter a CPU/part runs - it halves the lifespan.

If you are in a very well conrolled climate with 20C ambient air all the time and aren't worried about maximizing the lifespan of yor parts - the two stock case fans is probably fine.

If you live in the auzzie outback, no AC, so the ambient air gets 35+ and you want to maximize the life of the parts - you need TONS of additional airflow in the case.

Personally, I would leave it as stock for now but after a month or so of use would do some temperature monitoring and if the CPU/GPU/system temps are higher than you would like I would then buy a second 140mm (or 120) fan for the front intake and remove one of the side panel guards and allow air to escape there without a fan.
 
Solution

menetlaus

Distinguished
Jul 19, 2007
683
0
19,360


Do a search on temperature reducing lifespan of CPU and there are lots of people who use/agree/follow that rule of thumb. Is it perfect - no, but it at least gives most people an understanding on the trade-off of heat vs lifespan.

If you have some factual, comparative test results that scientifically show that heat does not effect the lifespan on CPU/GPU/silicon chips/etc - I would love to see it (as would all computer engineers).
 

dmovsho

Honorable
Apr 4, 2012
19
0
10,520
Thanks everyone for your help.
Another question though.
I read a lot of good and bad stuff on side fans. They help cool the GPU in the dead spot, but they interfere with the airflow in the case.
Should I get a small, 60-100mm fan, strong enough to get some cool air to the GPU, but not strong enough to interfere with the airflow?
Or will another top exhaust do better?
 
You NEED one on the front. DO NOT use a side intake with no front intake. I recommend just rear and front. That article is not very accurate as they only tested one case and one single fan. People agree that, while good for the uneducated masses, it is really 100% truth and there are WAY too many variables they didn't eve talk about.
 

menetlaus

Distinguished
Jul 19, 2007
683
0
19,360
Those temps look great, though the "gaming" usage can cover a wide range of loads.

If playing a big fish, very old, or other very low requirement/casual game the GPU seems about reasonable and CPU maybe a touch high (though easily explained if the game does most work on the CPU in order to run on systems with integrated graphics)

If playing an older/less demanding game (especially with vsync on) those numbers are bang on as the GPU isn't stressed as much by the older game and has a hard FPS cap that it can easily handle.

If playing a new, demanding game - I agree with tiny above and the GPU seems to be running very cold, which probably means you could up the resolution/settings as there is available headroom in the GPU to do more.
 

dmovsho

Honorable
Apr 4, 2012
19
0
10,520
Well, it was Civilization V (I'm old-school and a sucker for turn-based strategy), on highest defenitions.
I guess it meets your second defenition - moderete graphics with most work done on CPU...