3 x ROG Swift monitors?
- Thread starter Venrith
- Start date
Solution
Well, that's 11 million pixels per frame, aiming for 144 fps... you're aiming for well over a billion pixels a second.
I don't think even 2 GTX 980s will manage that on demanding games with high settings. But it'll run just fine and you can always find a nice balance between lowering detail for higher frame rates, or vice versa.
But 144fps across 3 1440p screen I don't think will happen often.
I don't think even 2 GTX 980s will manage that on demanding games with high settings. But it'll run just fine and you can always find a nice balance between lowering detail for higher frame rates, or vice versa.
But 144fps across 3 1440p screen I don't think will happen often.
manofchalk
Glorious
- May 11, 2012
- 12,914
- 3
- 48,960
In terms of what you need to run Surround, a single card will do it.
However performance in this situation would not be ideal. Your basically looking to run the equivalent of two 4k monitors above 80FPS ideally, the more GPU you can throw at this the better.
I would consider AMD cards here, they have always performed better when your scaling up resolution. Although you do miss out on the G-Sync capabilities of the Swift.
However performance in this situation would not be ideal. Your basically looking to run the equivalent of two 4k monitors above 80FPS ideally, the more GPU you can throw at this the better.
I would consider AMD cards here, they have always performed better when your scaling up resolution. Although you do miss out on the G-Sync capabilities of the Swift.
TRENDING THREADS
-
-
News Firefox user loses 7,470 opened tabs saved over two years after they can’t restore browsing session- Started by Admin
- Replies: 58
-
Question Looking to upgrade my pc for more video and photo editing with light gaming.
- Started by fuzmaster
- Replies: 3
-
News Apple debuts M4 processor in new iPad Pros with 38 TOPS on neural engine
- Started by Admin
- Replies: 80
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram