Pre-overclocked GPU vs. Normal memory speeds

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Majestic5

Majestic5

Reputable
Oct 28, 2014
31
0
4,530
I have heard many claims that a pre-overclocked GPU is always superior, and vice-versa. I'm looking to get a Nvidia 970 Graphics card. I heard the Asus STRIX 970 is not pre-overclocked like the MSI 970. Is a regular speed GPU beneficial in the sense that it will extend the components lifetime. I would appreciate suggestions of other cards as well.

http://pcpartpicker.com/p/WHMByc (current list with the MSI)
 
Solution
Sakkura
Doesn't matter for the lifetime of the card, the differences are so small. Besides, the Asus Strix 970 is factory overclocked, just a little less than the MSI version.
Sort by date Sort by votes
Shneiky

Shneiky

Distinguished
Aug 21, 2011
2,323
1
20,960
Factory overclocked cards are overclocked by the cards Firmware or the card's BIOS (call it whatever you wish). While games do not care about software overclocking, a lot of productivity software does not tolerate software overclocks. For example, PremierPro almost always crashes if you have a software overclock. Other than that, there is no difference whatsoever. And to be hones, throughout all my years, I have yet to have an Asus card die on me in a reasonable time. My dad had his GeForce 4400 (yes, correct GeForce 4400 from year 2002) die few years ago. But that is 10 years of usage, and for a gamer that is a lot more than you will be using the card. For me it is a no-brainer when it comes to Asus video cards. They are the quietest and most durable out there, though with lower clocks and higher price. I would always take an Asus instead of something else. But the last part is some facts mixed with my personal experience and feelings. Anyway, both cards will make you happy. Cheers.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom