AMD A10 7850K Vs. FX - 8350

CoolaxGaming

Reputable
Oct 28, 2014
292
0
4,860
Hello, before we begin, here are my computer specs.

Amd fx 8350 8 cores
Sabertooth 990FX R 2.0
Corsair 16 Gb ram
Corsair h 100i
Radeon HD 7850
Radeon HD 7850
Corsair 1200 watt PSU
Cooler master haf xm mid tower

So, I recently heard about AMD's new APU's. Well, the latest chipset for fx is 5 years old and lacks a lot of things. A10- 7850K and the crossblade ranger are the parts I am going after.
So with my extreme cooler, and over clocking skills, can I get it to run as fast as my fx 8350. Or is it impossible and will cause a bottleneck?
 
Solution
I don't think AMD has anything to offer as far as CPU upgrades for your 8350. No matter how OCed I don't think a 7850K will be able to match an 8350, especially because you could just OC the 8350 then. If gaming is your goal, stick with the 8350. I don't think Excavator will be enough to match an 8350's performance unless they get it to catch up to an i5 and have a high OC headroom.

delaro

Judicious
Ambassador
FX 8350 is barely 2 years old and is far better at gaming than Any APU. As far as the supporting chip sets as long as your supporting PCI-e 3 your good. If you stay with AMD, You are better off with the Fx 8350 and a single GPU vs a SLI on low to medium cards. Overclock your FX 8350 and it will handle just about anything.

If you want new features or better CPU gaming performance move to Intel as the I3's and I5's are nearly always faster in games over any AMD cpu and you have new options for supporting chips with H97,Z97,Z99.
 

cemerian

Honorable
Jul 29, 2013
1,011
0
11,660
no chance in world of getting it even close, first of its has only 4 modules, so you are already cutting multithreaded performance in half there(keep in mind multithread performance is the only place fx series actually are good, while in single thread performance even though its steamroller, it can no longer clock as high as the bulldozer in fx 8350(most will do 5ghz), in then end you will only loose performance to get integrated graphics on the apu, the fx 83xx(the fx 9xxx is just factory overclocked fx 8350's and in many cases wont clock as high as the 8350's do) is still the best option from amd if you are interested in more or less good performance after overclocking, that would just be a downgrade in your situation
 

CoolaxGaming

Reputable
Oct 28, 2014
292
0
4,860


Anytime soon the APU will beat the fx
 

Rafael Luik

Reputable
Sep 18, 2014
86
0
4,660
Not regarding single-thread performance, the best FM2+ processors can beat and go head to head with them look at the Dolphin benchmarks for example. So it depends on what architecture the games/apps prefer.

To use a dedicated GPU the A10-7850K makes no sense though, look for the Athlon X4 860K they've cut the iGPU to offer a far better price.
 

CoolaxGaming

Reputable
Oct 28, 2014
292
0
4,860


So wait for Excavator
 

bmacsys

Honorable
BANNED
I have a Crossblade Ranger and a A10-7850K clocked at 4.5 GHz with the igpu also overclocked. I also have an 8320 clocked to 4.6 GHz on a Sabertooth 990FX with a discrete card. For everyday use I take the APU rig hands down. Less heat. Less fan noise. For rendering, and gaming it is the 990 rig no question.
 

Zerk2012

Titan
Ambassador

No buy Intel!

 

slyu9213

Honorable
Nov 30, 2012
1,054
0
11,660
I don't think AMD has anything to offer as far as CPU upgrades for your 8350. No matter how OCed I don't think a 7850K will be able to match an 8350, especially because you could just OC the 8350 then. If gaming is your goal, stick with the 8350. I don't think Excavator will be enough to match an 8350's performance unless they get it to catch up to an i5 and have a high OC headroom.
 
Solution

CoolaxGaming

Reputable
Oct 28, 2014
292
0
4,860

No offense but Intel sucks.
Period
 

delaro

Judicious
Ambassador


Athlon X4 860K's have issues, the 750K is just a better chip with more Overclock potential.



I believe Excavator APU's will equal or surpass FX- 8350's, in gaming terms the A10-7850K is a little behind it now. If the APU's receive the projected 20% performance increase then that would put them on part with the FX chip.
 

delaro

Judicious
Ambassador
FX- 8350 is about the best you get out of AMD, sadly the I3-4130 and Pentium G3258 overclocked equal or surpass the FX chip in most game titles at any resolution. I've always been a AMD fan but proven performance is proven performance.
 

Rafael Luik

Reputable
Sep 18, 2014
86
0
4,660
Hm I don't think so, the 750K is two generations behind (or more if you count the low power ones), it's Trinity and since then there was Richland now we are in Kaveri. 750K is kinda a low-end in FM2.

The 860K is Kaveri, it's basically the A10-7850K without the iGPU and cheaper (it's sightly sigthly better). The best performance you can get before Excavator comes out... What issues are you talking about?
Investing in OC makes no sense for me, I'd rather get an i3 than get an Athlon or Pentium + aftermarket cooler for OC.
 

cemerian

Honorable
Jul 29, 2013
1,011
0
11,660


check out Austins review on youtube, he did just that compared the 860k @4.4ghz to a pentium g3258@ 4.7 and the pentium beat the athlon in everything, the extra cores don't change a thing when they are to weak, also richland had better oc potential than the new kaveri parts
 

Myth_N_Legend

Reputable
May 31, 2015
5
0
4,510
Keep in mind AMD has stated that the new APU's are for a target audience, you can play games like League of legend's etc with out a discrete GPU. If you are trying to play games like Battlefield 4 then yeah it will do poorly.