GTX970 High Expectations ?

dsr07mm

Distinguished
Maybe I expected much more from this gpu and I'm not getting that.

I'm gaming at 1080p monitor with 60hz refresh rate.

AC Unity Maxed Out with FXAA - 45-60
Ryse Son of Rome - 45-60
Tomb Raider - Average ~ 80-85 at extreme

Heaven Benchmark (8xAA, Quality Ultra, Tess Extreme) - Score: 1471, FPS 58.4
Fire Streke Bench - GPU Score 12 792

After seeing all those threads on all forums that GTX970 is slight overkill for gaming now I'm not really sure.

And yes this is with overclock. Core 1507mhz, Memory 3802mhz.

Is this okay ?
 

Nazgren

Honorable
Aug 28, 2012
52
0
10,640
It depends on the graphics requirements for what you consider gaming. For one person it could be nothing more then internet flash gaming, but for me its skyrim with majority 4k textures and no small amount of 8k textures, and one of the most resource intensive ENB's there currently is. My current GPU is the GTX 780 TI ghz edition which isnt *too* far behind the 980, but as my skyrim currently stands, i haven't got a hope in hell of running it until the 980 TI comes out, the 970 certainly wouldn't cut it. What you need to ask is, what are you likely to want from a GPU. If all your going to run is games with the graphics they come with maxed out at 1920x1080 then your probably fine with what you currently have. If your wanting to go to 4k or higher textures or get a 4k monitor then an upgrade probably wouldn't hurt. In which case i would wait till February (rumored, cant be much later) and get the 980 TI if possible.
 

dsr07mm

Distinguished
Thanks mcnumpty23 for confirmation.

@Nazgren, I'm not going over 1080p60hz vsync on, but for the sake of benchmarks I'm now trying to do max things. Antialising and other options are not priority as long as textures and more important "Details settings" are maxed out.
 

Nazgren

Honorable
Aug 28, 2012
52
0
10,640
Then I think that what your getting is what you'd expect from a 970, remember its not much more then a mid end GPU and that AC:Unity is spectacularly unoptimized, to the extent that even the consoles it was made for are struggling to deal with it, PC isn't any better. If you getting 45-60 FPS then i'd say your lucky from what I've heard. I don't really see a problem with what you've linked, given the specs of a 970.

Also, you say as long as textures and details are at max, but there is no max. E.G. Skyrim is now 3 years old, yet as mine currently stands, no game will even come close to its graphics for at least another 3, very likely more. Even Shadows of Mordor with hi res DLC doesn't come close. If like you say, your not so bothered about anti-aliasing and you can run Unity at max with anti-aliasing at 45-60 fps then i fail to see an issue, if you absolutely must have a minimum of 60 FPS then drop the anti-alising down a notch. I think your expecting too much from a casual gamer level reference card. For this reason when the 900 series hit the shelves i saved my money, knowing that the TI version would be out soon, at 8GB vram on a single card it will make a mockery of the performance of the reference models. It will likely be the first, single card that can run a game such as skyrim at its current full, graphical potential, at least at 1920x1080, going up to 3840 x 2160 would without a doubt necessitate a second card.

You stated in your first post that people say the 970 is overkill for gaming, but gaming encompasses so much that this a terrible statement to make. If a game that is 3 years old can make the 970 billow more smoke then frames then it cant be considered overkill. It may be overkill for something low res and tacky, like pong, or AC:unity, but for real gaming, it doesn't even come close. Its like GPU benchmarkers saying X card is best because it can run Y game at 1080p at Z FPS. 1080p is meaningless. Sorry to go off on a bit of a rant, but living my life around console gamers has made this a very frustrating topic for me so my apologies if i come off at all hostile, it is not intended.
 

dsr07mm

Distinguished


Understandable. But again even if its mid range card, it's again at the top of the chart in terms of benchmarks if you are looking at single GPU's. My GTX770 was far far behind this performance anyways. I like to think that its almost high end card for 1080p gaming especially with vsync on. All in all thanks everyone.