Intel or amd ? who is better on the long road? (5-6years) 'till the next upgrade.

Solution


((SIMPLE GOOGLE these news and you can see for yourself this is true))

1) AMD stopped any production of FX 'new models' years ago and public stated it's focus was the APU line, which is cheap, low end, and for portable (tablet, phones, etc.) models. PC Gaming in AMDs view seems a dead end business wise and the cost to 'switch gears' like that is TOO HIGH to be profitable, so AMD in gaming, now and stated publically is DEAD. Coudl they suddenly change in 2 or 3 years YEAH anything can.

2) INTEL has stopped ALL desktop making, HASWELL was the final line...

uthvag

Reputable
Oct 5, 2014
1,115
0
5,660
for long term i would suggest the intel one as they always perform better than the AMD ones (though pricey)

and 5-6 years depend on your use.... looking at your GPU- gaming?? if it is for gaming then neither..invest in a higher end card and wait for it to get outdated...

in terms of reliability -i still have a core 2 duo running on 4 GB ddr2 ram with a 9500GT which is almost 7years

hope it helps
 


Intel, As you can see a Z97/H97 board will use 5th generation intel cores. A 2nd generation I5 2500K can still handle the games we use today, but they are already edging out. I would use intel for long lasting gaming RIGS :), for 7 years with a card? Hmmmm, most likely, I had a HD Radeon 5770, it is a old card but I used it all the way from 2009 to now and I got some smooth ratings on it, but of course now it only runs on Low Settings with 20-30 FPS.
 

mhirons

Reputable
Oct 8, 2014
120
0
4,710
You don't mention where you are located or whether this is for gaming, but I'm going to assume that it is.

I think you'll get more bang for your buck by dropping the CPU to an i3 4160 and then getting the best GPU you can. If you look around and are patient, you can get some good deals on AMD cards (R9 280X, 280, 270X, etc).
 

sammy sung

Distinguished
The 2500K still won't be a bottleneck on any single card on the market as of the now. For gaming AMD is hardly even relevant now, with the processors they released some time ago. The 9xxx FX series is a flop and their 8320/8350 struggle to play on equal footing with lesser i5 haswells

Get a 4690K or 4790K and be happy for the next several years
 

Dragos Romaniuc

Reputable
Nov 18, 2014
17
0
4,520
I'm not a gamer in the full sense of the word... I play dota(3 hours per day), the new games, Medium/High/Ultra are the same graphics for me... Im interested to learn video editing, (AdobeAfterEffects, Sony Vegas, etc etc) which requieres a system for video editing/rendering and I'm interested for a system that will multitasking well.

Sorry for my english !!!
 


((SIMPLE GOOGLE these news and you can see for yourself this is true))

1) AMD stopped any production of FX 'new models' years ago and public stated it's focus was the APU line, which is cheap, low end, and for portable (tablet, phones, etc.) models. PC Gaming in AMDs view seems a dead end business wise and the cost to 'switch gears' like that is TOO HIGH to be profitable, so AMD in gaming, now and stated publically is DEAD. Coudl they suddenly change in 2 or 3 years YEAH anything can.

2) INTEL has stopped ALL desktop making, HASWELL was the final line, with only BROADWELL in the pipe (basically a 2.0 upgrade of HASWELL) to complete and THEY TOO only will focus on the portable, low cost, low power marketspace as well. They shut down the plants that make the chipsets and so on, so again same thing from INTEL. BUT the current INTEL CPUs are NEWER, FASTER and better than the HIGHEST end AMD FX chip, that now the benchmarks in gaming show it to be i3 then FX8, then i5 then i7. FX6, FX4, APUs, DualCore Intels etc. are cheaper but aren't capable enough for titles.

3) That said, the systems you picked, as noted below, suck with the GPU, you need to invest in a serious GPU for current title games and 'long term' investment. Nvidia GPUs are best x60, x70, x80 models (i.e. 760, 770, 980, etc.) any other ones you see (x40, x50, x25, etc.) are all LOW END NOT FOR GAMING GPUs. These are mainly to fill the marketspace of the prices your hoping for - i.e. $200Laptop/$300Desktop to sucker you in.

4) HARDWARE IS ONLY WARRANTIED FOR THREE YEARS. So trying to build a 6 year old system means for 3 years your risking POOF it died. Sorry that is the fact on it, and you can open ANY computer right now and look on ANY part / look up that part and it will tell you the same thing WE GARUNTEE IT WILL WORK FOR ONLY 3 YEARS.

5) Your price range limits your ability on the system performance, so you also need to have your EXPECTATIONS set with such a limited budget. IF you WANT "what I see on youtube" that will set you back around $1200-1500 on desktops, over $2K on laptops. Mainly because the video cards take up 1/4 of that price ALONE (yea over $400!!!) to play "like I see on youtube" games being played ANY TITLE. So either pony up twice more funds, expect to REPLACE out the GPU, PSU (to give it enough power for the card you pick) in the next year anyway, OR lower your expectations on what you want to play / what settings you want to play at.

6) LOOK UP THE GAMES you want to play, look at the benchmarks, check www.canirunit.com for the RECOMMENDED hardware for it, then measure all things together, and you will get a 'guess-idea' on the performance, CAN YOU ACCEPT THE GAME played in THOSE settings getting THAT performance? IF NO, then what does it COST to meet what you WANT? That will help point you at the hardware that will meet your needs, or accept your needs should change.
 
Solution