As with yor hd 5670, there was probably something else wrong other than a "bottleneck" that all these people obsess over. Could have been driver related or motherboard related. Or it was just a POS.
And as for the cpu. many many games most definitely take advantage of more than 2 cores these days. In fact most do. Going from a dual vore pentium to a quad core i5 is like night and day with a capable gpu in games. Holy moly im tellin ya. Definitely get the i5 if you can affford it. Its soooo badly worth the extra money for games. Were talking 35fps in a game like far cry 3 up to 60fps with a core i5 and decent gpu. Which in my opinion is from borderline playable framerates with a pentium/i3 to perfect gameplay with an i5
Damn.. I've been suffering with games at average FPS of 15, and 20 if I'm lucky with the settings. How I envy those who plays at 60 FPS!
Well so far the i5 is seems like a very good investment for the money, works well for both gaming and video editing, definitely gonna go for that one
I'd recall that you've mention earlier about the R7 260X, that the GPU might get outdated soon. From what I see of real world performance and multiple benchmarking, the GPU seems to work just nice at moderate game settings. I could settle with average FPS of 30, what I cant stand is constant stuttering and bugs that derived from bad optimisations. (Yeah, Bugisoft). That being said, I still agree with you though, the longevity of future gaming support is questionable. Eventhough it is a Mantle, Direct X 11.2, and Direct X 12 ready, I still have my doubts.
The R7 260X would settle for me in this year and next, and I believe this build is usable and stable enough that I hope would support my upgrade from R7 260X, to, say, R9 290 in the future.
Perhaps you have suggestions for an alternative for my R7 260X? Preferably within its price range. Nividia or AMD, doesnt matter, as I believe they're both made awesome GPU'S.