On board raid vs Raid Controller Raid 10 performance

XPLOT1ON

Reputable
Apr 28, 2014
89
0
4,660
I am planning to do RAID 10 on the Asus X99-E WS however I can't decide whether to do an onboard raid or use a raid controller (LSI 9260-8i)

I will be using RAID 10 with maximum of 8 SSDs

Which options would be better in terms of overall performance and stability.
The CPU that I will be running is 5930K so CPU taxing shouldn't be a major performance drawback
 
Solution


PCIe RAID card with your MB and 8x SSD in raid6 you can get about 1800MB/s at least (ARECA will do that) but LSI my guess should be the same or a tag slower. Don't use RAID10, you are wasting your precious space :)


When you use RAID on your MB. The RAID won't use much of CPU power, rather too many IRQ of each drive being send to CPU, you CPU ran out of time, not...

XPLOT1ON

Reputable
Apr 28, 2014
89
0
4,660

That's a very good point (battery back up and cache) but how much of the performance difference are there between the two options?


 

XPLOT1ON

Reputable
Apr 28, 2014
89
0
4,660


Do you know the exact model for on board raid for Asus X99-E WS. On the website it just said X99 Express Chipset with RAID
 

FireWire2

Distinguished


PCIe RAID card with your MB and 8x SSD in raid6 you can get about 1800MB/s at least (ARECA will do that) but LSI my guess should be the same or a tag slower. Don't use RAID10, you are wasting your precious space :)


When you use RAID on your MB. The RAID won't use much of CPU power, rather too many IRQ of each drive being send to CPU, you CPU ran out of time, not power...

Remember, way back then, when you format a floppy disc, or burn a CD in IDE bus the computer just freeze? Yeap too darm much IRQ

 
Solution

TRENDING THREADS