What does it take to keep a i7 4790k cool at 4.5ghz?

gasolin

Distinguished
Aug 6, 2012
563
3
19,015
Atm i use a thermalright macho zero with the fan from my true spirit 140 (140mm ty-147) and get 70 degrees using asus realbench and with prime 95 max heat the temperature is in a few sec about 95 degrees.

My cpu is oc'ed to 4.2 ghz on all cores and 1.20 volt.

What does it take to get a i7 4790k to run at 4.5 ghz and less then 80 degresse at max load, without the cpu cooler sounding like a hairdryer (i don't want to imagine what i would need to get max 80 degrees at 4.5ghz using prime 95)
 

Karl_oh

Reputable
Mar 31, 2014
439
0
4,960


I cant seem to think of any other solutions...

You could water cool your rig and get a silent pump

 

CompuTronix

Intel Master
Moderator


gasoline,

Recent versions of P95 (28.5) run AVX code on the Floating Point Unit in your processor, which is for heavy number crunching and creates unrealistically high temperatures. The FPU test in AIDA64 produces the same results.

Please use P95 version 26.6 - http://windows-downloads-center.blogspot.com/2011/04/prime95-266.html

Your Core temperatures will run 10 to 20C lower.

When using P95 for thermal testing, always run Small FFT's.

As I've explained in many threads, the message which accompanies Large FFT's regarding "maximum heat, power consumption" is actually somewhat misleading.

It would be more accurately and appropriately worded as "maximum overall heat, power consumption" which instead refers to heat and power shared among the processor, memory and motherboard, rather than inferring heat and power at the processor only.

Also, you might want to give this Tom's Sticky a good read: Intel Temperature Guide - http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/id-1800828/intel-temperature-guide.html

CT :sol:
 

gasolin

Distinguished
Aug 6, 2012
563
3
19,015


Amazing 20-22 degrees lower temps
 

gasolin

Distinguished
Aug 6, 2012
563
3
19,015
4th Generation 22 Nanometer: 4790K (TDP 88W / Idle 2W)

Standard Ambient = 22C
Tcase (CPU temp) = 74C
CPU / Core offset + 5C
Tjunction (Core temp) = 79C
Tj Max (Throttle temp) = 100C

The Core temperatures above show that mid 70's are safe. At Standard Ambient 22C, here's the typical operating range:

80C Hot
70C Warm (Heavy Load)
60C Norm
50C Norm (Medium Load)
40C Norm
30C Cool (Idle)

mabye 40 idle, low load 45-50, prime 95 26.6 about 73 degrees (mabye a bit higher after 5-10 min). I do have disabled power savings so i guess it's ok (ambient 21.5-23C) although i think low load temps around 45 and up to 5-6% cpu usage (for a few sec it can go as high as 10% but only for 1-2 sec) is just a bit to high
 
All of the all in one CPU water cooling solutions are crap IMO!

There's not one out there I'd spend my money on, the pump is limited, the rad is limited, the coolant is limited, and some are running extremely noisy fans to attempt to compensate for the other design inadequacies, but they're selling like Hotcakes to the uninformed.

Most are tailored to conveniently fit inside your precious, and though they will work much better than a stock cooler, the rad space is limited, which limits deltaT.

Most buy thinking it will give an overclocking advantage, but it is limited in what it can do, it's not an overclocking cure all it's a joke!

If your water cooling solution does not give you good deltaT results, you're spending more money on the all in one and fooling yourself, you'd have been better off with a high quality air cooler with 110cfm cooling fans running on it.

Lower ambient with excellent deltaT equals a higher CPU overclock, simple as that!

And, it won't be done with inadequate radiator cooling field.

My 2 cents! Ry
 

King Kevain

Reputable
Dec 10, 2014
413
0
4,960


280mm rad with 2 x decent fans will and do work fine - the Kraken X60 and X61 as one of the best AIO cooling solutions as is the Corsair H110. I have small kids mate, I need everything inside the box, not external radiators and pipes and crap and pretty colours through grills they want to jam pencils into. Believe it or not, the majority of people want a PC that looks like a PC, many Gamers want their PC's to be portable, not bits and bobs running everywhere such as external coolers and so forth.

For the record, a liquid cooler does give an OC advantage, when you compare it to every other solution that is worse than it! Every cooling solution is limited to what it can do.

For anyone that reads this that wants to know what Ryan is talking about, http://www.overclockers.com/guide-deltat-water-cooling/
 

CompuTronix

Intel Master
Moderator


Guys,

The thread took a left turn back here.

King Kevain jumped in probably without thoroughly reading what's already been resolved, which got 4Ryan6 going.

gasolin,

We've already established that your load temperatures are not a problem at you present settings, especially since you've now given us your ambient temperature. The original problem was that you simply weren't using P95 version 26.6.

Concerning your idle temperatures, you've already included the answer within your last post ... which is that you've disabled your power saving features.

Just for everyone's benefit, let me be clear about this; the only relevant temperatures are steady-state 100% workload, ambient, and dead idle ... in that order ... and even these are subjective!

Anything between 100% and dead idle represents apps or gaming, and can't be used to analyze thermal performance, but they're great for speculation, conjecture and debate.

Respectfully, since there are too many variables involved, we can not form meaningful comparisons or draw valid conclusions based on thermal data such as "low load temps around 45 and up to 5-6% cpu usage (for a few sec it can go as high as 10% but only for 1-2 sec)".

From the Temp Guide:

Section 11 - Thermal Testing Basics

We all remember science class where one of the guiding principles for conducting a controlled experiment, is that it's critical to follow the same procedure every time. This eliminates variables so results will be consistent and repeatable.

If everyone tests their rigs using X stress software at Y Ambient temperatures with Z measuring utilities resulting in CPU or Package or Core temperatures, then it's impossible to compare apples to apples. This is why processor temperatures are so confusing.

Sections 12 and 13 will explain how to properly test your rig at load, and at idle using standardized methods. Follow the "Setup" in each Section to duplicate Intel's lab test conditions as closely as possible. This will produce valid Core temperature benchmarks which are consistent and repeatable.


Section 13 - Thermal Testing @ Idle

" ... Core temperature sensors are designed to be more accurate at high temperatures for Throttle protection, so idle temperatures may not be accurate.

Remember that when you power up your rig from a cold start, all components are at Ambient, so temperatures can only go up. With conventional air or liquid cooling, no temperatures can be less than or equal to Ambient.

If "Speedstep", also called Enhanced Intel Speedstep Technology (EIST), is disabled in BIOS, then depending on Vcore and clock speed, idle Power can be nearly 40 Watts, which will result in high idle temperatures, especially when combined with high Ambient temperature.

Setup:

In addition to using the previous Setup under Section 12, Speedstep and all "C" States (C1E on earlier motherboards) needs to be enabled to achieve the lowest possible idle temperatures. Also, if Windows Power Options is not set correctly, then Speedstep will not work.

To check this, click on Control Panel, Power Options, then to the right of the selected plan, click on Change plan setting. Next click on Change advanced power settings, then drag the scroll bar down. Click on + next to Processor power management, then click on + next to Minimum processor state. This Setting must be 5%. If it's not, then correct it and click Apply.

Restart into BIOS and confirm that you've saved your settings to a Profile. Next, change all settings to stock (Default / Auto) including SpeedStep, all C States and Vcore, then save and exit. Reboot into Windows and confirm that your rig is at dead idle; no programs running, and off line. No Folding or SETI or tray trash running in the background, and less than 2% CPU Usage under the "Performance" tab in Windows Task Manager.

Use CPU-Z to confirm that Core Voltage and Core Speed has decreased as follows:

-> Core 2

1st. Generation 65 Nanometer ... less than 1.250 Volts @ 1600 Mhz
2nd Generation 45 Nanometer ... less than 1.100 Volts @ 2000 Mhz

-> Core i

1st. Generation 45 Nanometer ... less than 1.000 Volts @ 1600 Mhz
2nd Generation 32 Nanometer ... less than 1.000 Volts @ 1600 MHz
3rd Generation 22 Nanometer ... less than 0.900 Volts @ 1600 MHz
4th Generation 22 Nanometer ... less than 0.800 Volts @ 800 MHz

Use Hardware Monitor to confirm that Power has decreased as follows:

-> Core i

2nd Generation 32 Nanometer ... less than 8 Watts
3rd Generation 22 Nanometer ... less than 4 Watts
4th Generation 22 Nanometer ... less than 2 Watts

Note: Power (watts) isn't measured on Core 2 processors and certain 1st Generation Core i variants, but for general reference, idle power for several popular CPU's is shown above under Section 7 - Relative Temperatures.

Test:

Allow your rig to "settle" for 10 minutes, then use your thermometer to measure Ambient. Use Real Temp to measure your Core temperatures, then correct your results to Standard Ambient.

Results:

Core i 2nd, 3rd and 4th Generation processors should idle at less than 8C above Ambient. This means that at 22C Standard Ambient your Cores should idle just under 30C. Certain Core 2 variants and Core i 1st Generation variants may idle several degrees higher. The better your cooler and the lower your idle power, the lower your idle temperatures.


CT :sol:
 

gasolin

Distinguished
Aug 6, 2012
563
3
19,015
Have tried playing a bit with vcore and ghz to see some temps and vcore at differnet speeds. So fare i think my core speed goes up and down a bit to much (annoys me since i have enabled all power savings) when i have enabled powersavings from 800mhz to 4200mhz i do how ever get it down to under 0.700 volt but temps are high 35-37c i have on opened cpu-z and windows task manager but it never seems like it goes 100%idle (800mhz,x 8)
 

CompuTronix

Intel Master
Moderator
If you can consistently idle under 2% CPU usage, then your idle temperatures are as good as they're going to get at your ambient temperature. Remember that you must run the idle test with case covers open, and all fans at 100% RPM. You must follow the idle test procedure exactly, in order to get valid test results.

Intel follows very specific procedures in their labs under tightly controlled conditions ... to the letter. They don't take any shortcuts.
 

gasolin

Distinguished
Aug 6, 2012
563
3
19,015
ohh, i guess 45 degrees at low load and a bit lower temps at idle is more then okay.

Update, have the phanteks PH-TC14PE although it's a bit loud (compared to thermalright) i thought this one should be able to keep my cpu cool, it not in the 30's at 1.00 vcore and 4.0ghz, almost idle 40-42 degrees, max load with ibt (warmer then prime 95 ver 26.6) i could get it up to 4.3 ghz,vcore 1.150 and 80-81 degrees and since my cpu never gets so hot in everday use and gaming i would be more then okay.

Just know now that if i for any reason or other people want to run a i7 4790k at 4.5 ghz and less then 80 degress they need serious cooling like a corsair H105 or H110
 

CompuTronix

Intel Master
Moderator


This is already shown here in the Temp Guide:


Section 12 - Thermal Testing @ 100% Workload

Shown above from left to right: Small FFT's, Blend, Linpack and Intel Burn Test.

CT :sol:
 


Sometimes I tend to forget that, My Apologies!

I'm not running normal cooling anyway, you surely won't take it to a gaming event, and it is surely not kid with pencil friendly.

I run Chilled Water Cooling and all my experiments have been focused on getting more bang for the buck from the CPU that many everyday average overclockers do not even realize is even possible, so my case or cooling situation, is very rare.

I do however give advice from the traditional standpoint, and what I was simply saying regarding the OPs initial request of "What does it take to keep a i7 4790k cool at 4.5ghz?" and the first point is, what is his definition of cool, and what is he comfortable running his overclocked CPU at 24/7.

That's why my first post in this thread was linking an overclocking study that included the i7-4790K, which covered just about every cooling solution there is.

If he has the proper case to house it all, which IMO would and should be the first consideration of a build, a full custom water loop will give him the best possible temperatures for his 4.5ghz request, which is still gaming portable, and can be made child friendly.

Though there are some AIO Coolers that can best the high end Air Coolers and give a slight overclock advantage, those tests of comparison were never tested with high CFM cooling fans, just the stock fans the Air coolers come with, which is a fair comparison, since the AIO CPU water cooler is also tested with the fans it comes with.

High CFM fans mounted on a high quality air cooler is also a fit in the case solution, also game portable, and also as child friendly as any PC.

It kinda seems you missed that point, so I hope that clears up the initial point I was trying to make. Ryan

Edit: By the way Thank You for posting Conumdrums "Guide to Delta-T in Water Cooling".


 

gasolin

Distinguished
Aug 6, 2012
563
3
19,015
Tried my Theramlright Macho zero again,it shouldn't have so high themps and it had to be better then the true spirit 140 alone by the size of the tower, i again used the Ty-147 fan and instead of using artic cooler MX-2 i used thermalright's CF III, after i mounted it (not tested temps) i looked if i had not connected my fan properly to the tower, one of the 4 points wasn't connected, i had to make shure the wire mounts was holding the fan in place, after that my temps at 4.3ghz and vcore 1.100 is 41 degresse at low load
 


Much Better! :)

That Thermalright Macho Zero, is a passive marketed heat pipe cooler and very impressive design, with fans mounted it should produce some great cooling results!

The very first passive cooler we ever had came from Thermalright and this looks like just as fine a quality product!

 

doyll

Distinguished
Jul 23, 2010
2
0
18,510
FYI:
Macho Rev. B / Macho Zero are quite good .. with both exhaust shroud and fan even better. They are same cooler; one with fan & one with exhaust shroud. The TY-147 A is same fan as older TY-147 with different PWM speed curve from 300-1300rpm compared to old 600-1300rpm. TY-147A stays at lower percent speed until about 1100rpm then climbs faster reaching 1300rpm a little sooner than TY-147.
 

gasolin

Distinguished
Aug 6, 2012
563
3
19,015
I think i might try a second fan if i can find one cheap, at 4.5 ghz and 1.250 volt it's just over 80 in prime 95 and 90+ using ibt high if i want to go for 4.5ghz

How ever i have found this clc water cpu cooler http://www.alphacool.com/product_info.php/info/p1152_Alphacool-NexXxoS-Cool-Answer-120-LT-ST---Set.html?language=en&XTCsid=158cjgh7u8ijmnnvd6741isua5 for 140€

The bigger 240 version costs 180€ the 120 version is the cheapest clc i have seen, but i don't now the quality of the parts and especially how noisy the pump, the fan i can always change to bitfenix spectre pro i think (theres a video abouit the performance of the fan but couldn't find it other wise i would have linked to it)