Buying a gaming PC, would this work for max graffics on crysis 3

Drewblueeye

Reputable
Nov 1, 2014
22
0
4,510
intel i7-4790
asetek 510LC liquid cooling
16 GB ripjaw DDR3-1600 (8GB x 2)
GeForce GTX 760 2GB
Gygabyte GA-Z79X-Gaming 7 motherboard
750W corsair RM750
1 TB hard drive
24xDual layer DVD+R/+RW

I am open for any suggestions. Overkill? Not enough? I don't want to spend a fortune, but that is in my budget. Unless the Motherboard or graphics card is too much or little

REVIZED!

I am planning on buying it from IBUYPOWER... I know I know, I could build it cheaper... but I really like their stuff... so I will go with the i5 4690K and a Geforce GTX 970 4GB (is it worth the money for the "superclocked"

the main thing now is I am stuck on a motherboard... I know nothing about motherboards when it comes to gaming. everything else I am pretty knowledgeable on . any advise on the choices of motherboard for the i5/i7 configure?
 
Solution
I'd have to agree that for most, the i7 is unwarranted and wasted power. An i5 will perform almost identically in almost all games today. Most games are optimized to only use 4 cores, aka 4 threads, which the i5 has. The i7 has 4 physical cores, but it has two threads to each core, allowing it to effectively have 8 cores. The difference in games will only flesh out if you have a crap ton of other heavy programs running at the same time (i.e. video rendering software, etc.) or when games finally start using more than 4 threads/cores (this is already slowly starting to happen with the latest titles).

You may think then, that it's a good idea to buy an i7 to future-proof and get better performance when your hardware starts to...

slipjack

Reputable
Sep 26, 2014
9
0
4,510
I've always been told an i5 is plenty enough for gaming, and usually a better GPU would enhance games more than the i7 would. So personally I would go i5 4690K (unlocked, can overclock) and then upgrade at the GPU to a GTX 970 or something along those lines. Gives you more FPS without really stretching the budget a ton right away. Also you can get motherboards that fit an i7 to futureproof your build in case you need an i7 in the future.

If you can afford a SSD to install your OS and main games on, I definitely recommend it. Some can be had for $80-100 for a 128 GB.

Havent played Crisis yet so not exactly sure how intense it is from a PC usage standpoint, but I would recommend checking benchmarks online for the different graphics cards on different games, to see the FPS difference so you can make the best decision for you, good luck!
 

Lmah

Honorable
May 3, 2013
472
0
10,960
I would say it can't run it max settings 1080p. I would say get a 4690k and put more money into GPU. Also is there a reason you need a GA-Z97x- Gaming 7 ($180-190)? You could get by with a cheaper motherboard as well. I would say look at a EVGA z97 FTW ($130 on newegg) and save some money. Get atleast a GTX 970, R9 290x
 
Aftermarket cooling not required on a non k processor

Asetek CLCs ? .... I don't get it.... more cooling for less dollars and less noise with an air cooler..... see above

Can't recommend the RM Series.... anticipating SLI ? If now can go w/ a smaller and better PSU .... (XFX, Seasonic M12 or S12, EVGA B2) see
http://www.tomshardware.com/answers/id-2311121/power-supply-requirements-nvidia-gpus.html#14243229

Given budget limitations, recommend an upgrade to a 1 TB SSHD , combines an SSD and a HD in one component. Tho I have an SSD (2 actually) for my boot drive, games left on the HD didn't see any benefit do used SSHDs (again 2) and am quite impressed with the performance.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822178381
 

endeavour37a

Honorable
For a gaming rig an i5 is just fine and will serve you well for a great while, the question is if you want to OC your CPU a bit as that will have an impact on the CPU and MB you need. The best bang for the buck in gaming is the graphics card itself, cutting back a little on other areas to get more GPU power is the path to better FPS overall.
 

Gunmetal_61

Reputable
Jun 12, 2014
168
0
4,760
I'd have to agree that for most, the i7 is unwarranted and wasted power. An i5 will perform almost identically in almost all games today. Most games are optimized to only use 4 cores, aka 4 threads, which the i5 has. The i7 has 4 physical cores, but it has two threads to each core, allowing it to effectively have 8 cores. The difference in games will only flesh out if you have a crap ton of other heavy programs running at the same time (i.e. video rendering software, etc.) or when games finally start using more than 4 threads/cores (this is already slowly starting to happen with the latest titles).

You may think then, that it's a good idea to buy an i7 to future-proof and get better performance when your hardware starts to fall behind the times and 8+ threaded games become the norm. Possibly, but most current games don't push harder at all than most CPUs (like the i5) can handle, so it's a trivial argument. And keep in mind that since you're future-proofing is also built around hardware from today that supports the CPU (most importantly, the motherboard), you may find yourself missing out on new things like more PCIe lanes, new peripheral port specifications, RAM speeds and standards, that sort of thing. And it'll all be available for cheaper in the future.

On top of that, I'd say that the best target to future-proof the heck out of if you're going to try to is the GPU. A rule of thumb is to spend (at least) 1.5-2X more on the GPU than the CPU in your system. Emphasize a single, strong card before stacking on a second, third, or even fourth card. What some people do is they buy the first one, and when it starts to age, they get a second identical one a few years down the line when they can be found for cheap even when new.

So what does this long, winded explanation say? If you have the money, get an i7 if you so desire, but if money is tight, it's better to look long and hard at an i5 setup with a better GPU. With an i5, I'd recommend a single R9 280X, a R9 290 or a GTX 970 at least. Personally, I went with 2 R9 280's in Crossfire (but they were very cheap for the performance at $175 each during Black Friday). You can get a 280 for about $200 right now, and they are only slightly behind the GTX 770 in benchmarks for significantly less. That's another viable option. People with money to burn commonly buy the i7 and two R9 290 or 290X's, GTX 970's or 980's. Get the overclockable K-version of either processor if you're sticking with a Z97 motherboard.
 
Solution

Gunmetal_61

Reputable
Jun 12, 2014
168
0
4,760


The X97 is a typo right? I think you mean Z97. That's Intel's mainstream CPU board standard. The X99-type boards are meant for the LGA 2011 socket CPUs, aka the i7 Extremes and Xeon E5's.

This goes for all motherboards, not just the Z97:
If it's a Z97 chipset motherboard, then it's just as fast as any other motherboard that's Z97. There is no performance difference. Only quality and features (which of course, is dependent on price). Some are reputed to be more reliable than others. Some have more SATA ports. Some have two PCIe slots for multi-GPU setups. Some have 3. Some have more USB 3.0 ports. Some even have built-in Wi-Fi adapters. Choose a board that has what you need. For a Z97 board, you can get a quality one for as little as ~$120. There is no notable difference other than perhaps bling and minuscule features that only the major overclocker and tweaker would use in premium boards like the $220 Sabertooth Z97 or the Maximus VII boards. But they do have cool color schemes.

Motherboard makers commonly deemed reputable include MSI, Gigabyte, and Asus from what I've seen. EVGA and ASRock seem to have good reps, but I haven't read much of them.
 

endeavour37a

Honorable
Gunmetal, that was an excellent post as I read every word of it. Your train of thought is wise and right to anyone like this person asking his question. The only exception I take is comparing a 290 to a 770, the 290x is slightly behind a 770, the 290 is not a contender.
 

cmi86

Distinguished
With a single 760, That is a joke right ? It's crysis were taking about here. I used to run 2 7870 LE's overclocked in crossfire and that was BARELY enough to run maxed out 1080p @ 60 FPS still drops in big open areas or intense firefights. One 7870 LE @ 1200/1600 is a hair faster than a 760 at stock so do the math.