First PC Build

laidbackcracker

Reputable
Dec 18, 2014
4
0
4,510
I think I've done my homework. Been reading a lot about specs and such, even down to figuring out the PC3 xxx notation on RAM sticks.

What I've pieced together so far is compatible on paper:

Motherboard -MSI 990FXA-GD80
CPU - AMD FX4350
RAM - GSkill Ripjaw X (2X8)
SSD - 300GB
HDD(x3) - Seagate Cheetah 250GB+

I'm trying to future-proof the whole thing because I doubt I'll be able to repeat this process again for at least 5 years. Only problem is I'm a bit indecisive about a GPU.

I use Gimp, Blender, and Inkscape. sometimes I'll have Blender and Gimp running simultaneously. Not only that, but I play Ghost Recon Phantoms, and I'd like to actually be able to put my purchased BF4 to use. (I bought it and then found out that I was barely out off spec for the game.) And then there's Minecraft, but I'm sure meeting a standard for BF4 will surely cover MC.

So, any words of wisdom as to how to deal with my graphics needs? Should I run 2 GPUs? I don't know.

Part of the 3 x HDD is the urge to compartmentalize failures with RAID5. I don't care to put anything other than programs on the SSD (my primary drives have been named "OS/Programs" since the first time I partitioned a hard drive. And other partitions/HDs are used for saving files.

Basically, I don't want to wait even 3 seconds for a media file to load.

Oh, and thanks. A whole lot.
 
What kind of game settings are you expecting to use and what monitor resolution will you be running at?

You don't need 16GB of RAM for gaming, but it might be beneficial when running some of your applications simultaneously. 8GB is still probably fine even then as none of those are high end professional applications like those for CAD or serious rendering.

You would likely be good to go with an R9 280 or GTX 760 but if you can afford it, the GTX 970 is clearly the recent GPU of choice for default adapter to go with due to it's severe performance, low heat and power consumption and relatively low cost compared to similar performing units.

Anything above the 280 or 760 is going to get you closer to where you want to be, it just depends on what you can afford to do in this area.
 

laidbackcracker

Reputable
Dec 18, 2014
4
0
4,510
24" monitor @ 1080p. Sorry, not a hardware person.

Game settings - so long as they aren't even close to noticeably glitchy. (About 60fps, right?)

Edit - I use Google Earth and Trimble also. Not sure if Trimble qualifies as CAD...
 

laidbackcracker

Reputable
Dec 18, 2014
4
0
4,510
If I can't afford to do it right I'll stick with my current set up. It isn't great, DELL XPS 420... (can't upgrade it...) unless anyone can point me in the direction of aftermarket BTX goodies.

And for the win:

Where is a good psu calc on the net? I'm getting 300w variations between several that I've tried so far?
 
Calculators are worthless. Use the GPU recommendations at the following link. They include any additional hardware requirements for all but the most seriously power hungry hardware like the AMD 9xxx FX chips or rigs with overclocked hardware. IF you plan to overclock anything, add another 100w to the total.

http://www.realhardtechx.com/index_archivos/Page362.htm

Also, don't go strictly off capacity to decide if a power supply is worthwhile. Brand and rated wattage are not good indicators of quality. Use the following list as a guide along with reviews from reputable hardware review sites like RealhardtechX, HardOCP, Tom's hardware, guru3D, bit-tech and jonnyGURU. Recommendation for rigs with high end cards or overclocked hardware is Tier 2B or higher.

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/id-1804779/power-supply-unit-tier-list.html
 

TRENDING THREADS