Intel I3 4150 vs Amd Fx 6300 stock speed for Gaming
- Thread starter pallab007
- Start date
Solution
Jonas Magnusson
Reputable
- Nov 7, 2014
- 584
- 0
- 5,160
I prefer AMD for most games though. It depends on what game you're playing and in what resolution you have.
In compute intensive games that scale well to the many cores of the FX chip, the FX-6300 and i3-4150 perform about the same. In compute intensive games that only scale to 1-4 threads, the i3-4150 always performs better. In games that aren't compute intensive, they perform the same.
Jonas Magnusson
Reputable
- Nov 7, 2014
- 584
- 0
- 5,160
Link, i prefer AMD cuz it performs better. Now i don't mean all of them ofcourse, only AMD 7640G+7600M HD vs Intel core i5-3330.
Jonas Magnusson
Reputable
- Nov 7, 2014
- 584
- 0
- 5,160
Link, i can play gta iv on max settings and still squeeze out 20-30 FPS out of it. Does the FX ones perform better than my current setup?
DubbleClick
Admirable
- Jun 16, 2014
- 2,116
- 1
- 6,460
Jonas, you're comparing an APU to a CPU. The apu is obviously going to be better in graphic intensive things - that's what it was designed for.
For cpu performance (if you had a dedicate gpu or render videos or so) the I5 is more than twice as fast.
As for I3 vs Fx in games, the I3 would probably win in 80% of all games and perform similar in 15 out of the remaining 20%. However, getting an I5 4460 isn't that much of an extra and should be worth it, especially for online games.
For cpu performance (if you had a dedicate gpu or render videos or so) the I5 is more than twice as fast.
As for I3 vs Fx in games, the I3 would probably win in 80% of all games and perform similar in 15 out of the remaining 20%. However, getting an I5 4460 isn't that much of an extra and should be worth it, especially for online games.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram