I have a friend that is offering to switch his r9 290x for my gtx 970. We'll even switch PSUs. From the hardware, it seems like the 290x has MUCH more of everything: memory bus, shader units, tex map units but also HEAT, power consumption. However...all benchmarks i have seen have 970's way ahead of the 290's in performance.
How is this possible and should i make the switch?
My GPU:
http://www.amazon.com/MSI-GTX-970-GAMING-4G/dp/B00NN0GEXQ/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1420900160&sr=1-2&keywords=msi+970+gaming
Friends GPU:
http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-VAPOR-X-PCI-Express-Graphics-11227-04-40G/dp/B00JJJW4Z2/ref=sr_1_2?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1420899758&sr=1-2&keywords=amd+290x
He's a friend so I think I can talk him to a trial-run and go from there. Plus i really wanna try out crossfire; I hate you can't mix-match even similar gpus for NVIDIA
How is this possible and should i make the switch?
My GPU:
http://www.amazon.com/MSI-GTX-970-GAMING-4G/dp/B00NN0GEXQ/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1420900160&sr=1-2&keywords=msi+970+gaming
Friends GPU:
http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-VAPOR-X-PCI-Express-Graphics-11227-04-40G/dp/B00JJJW4Z2/ref=sr_1_2?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1420899758&sr=1-2&keywords=amd+290x
He's a friend so I think I can talk him to a trial-run and go from there. Plus i really wanna try out crossfire; I hate you can't mix-match even similar gpus for NVIDIA