My Sapphire HD 7870 is about to die (green screen, stuttering), so I am replacing it. I might as well upgrade the card while I'm at it, and initially was looking at an r9 270 until I found out they were practically the same thing. Between the CPU and GPU I would like to stay under $550, but that's.... elastic.
Currently have 8GB ram, and an FX 4350 CPU. I will be upgrading the CPU to an i5 sometime in the next couple months, which brings me to another question
So I'm looking at a few different cards:
Sapphire Radeon R9 290, I was looking at this one because it's one of the cheapest 290's, making it attractive. My understanding is that this is a "reference" card, so it has overheating issues.
http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Version-PCI-Express-Graphics-11227-00-40G/dp/B00HJOXUKC/ref=sr_1_6?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1421265516&sr=1-6&keywords=r9+290x&pebp=1421329378267&peasin=B00HJOXUKC
R9 290x This one is supposedly great, but it's expensive, which brings me to the next question.
http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Version-PCI-Express-Graphics-11226-00-40G/dp/B00HJOKARI/ref=sr_1_3?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1421265516&sr=1-3&keywords=r9+290x&pebp=1421329494160&peasin=B00HJOKARI
Is a lightning, vapor, or toxic, 290, at a cheaper price than a 290x, a better investment, or is spending the extra money on the X better in the long run? Because I honestly have no idea what the different between the vapor/toxic/lightning is, or how they are different than an X? I don't overclock, never had a need to.
If it helps, I play games on a 50" monitor (well, tv) at 1900x1080 resolution.
Currently have 8GB ram, and an FX 4350 CPU. I will be upgrading the CPU to an i5 sometime in the next couple months, which brings me to another question. Is it worth keeping with an AMD gpu for Mantle (instead of getting a gtx), with an Intel processor? I've read that Intel processors get more out of Mantle than an AMD would, which is my reason for picking both. I was concerned that i5's only have quad core, when AMD goes as high as 8core, and the 8350 8 core seems like the go-to AMD processor for gaming now.
Currently have 8GB ram, and an FX 4350 CPU. I will be upgrading the CPU to an i5 sometime in the next couple months, which brings me to another question
So I'm looking at a few different cards:
Sapphire Radeon R9 290, I was looking at this one because it's one of the cheapest 290's, making it attractive. My understanding is that this is a "reference" card, so it has overheating issues.
http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Version-PCI-Express-Graphics-11227-00-40G/dp/B00HJOXUKC/ref=sr_1_6?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1421265516&sr=1-6&keywords=r9+290x&pebp=1421329378267&peasin=B00HJOXUKC
R9 290x This one is supposedly great, but it's expensive, which brings me to the next question.
http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-Version-PCI-Express-Graphics-11226-00-40G/dp/B00HJOKARI/ref=sr_1_3?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1421265516&sr=1-3&keywords=r9+290x&pebp=1421329494160&peasin=B00HJOKARI
Is a lightning, vapor, or toxic, 290, at a cheaper price than a 290x, a better investment, or is spending the extra money on the X better in the long run? Because I honestly have no idea what the different between the vapor/toxic/lightning is, or how they are different than an X? I don't overclock, never had a need to.
If it helps, I play games on a 50" monitor (well, tv) at 1900x1080 resolution.
Currently have 8GB ram, and an FX 4350 CPU. I will be upgrading the CPU to an i5 sometime in the next couple months, which brings me to another question. Is it worth keeping with an AMD gpu for Mantle (instead of getting a gtx), with an Intel processor? I've read that Intel processors get more out of Mantle than an AMD would, which is my reason for picking both. I was concerned that i5's only have quad core, when AMD goes as high as 8core, and the 8350 8 core seems like the go-to AMD processor for gaming now.