GPU heating up? No indicated temp above 40c

tsmith154

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2011
138
0
18,690
My computer:
CPU: i7 5930K / Overclocked to 4.6
Mother board: X99S SLI PLUS
RAM: 4 sticks of 4gb. 2400 Hz.
GPU (three of them): Radeon R9 290X
Monitors (Three): BenQXL270T 27" set to 5760 X 1080 res.
Power supply Antec 1200 watt.
All components water cooled.

I overclock my gpu cards to:
Core Voltage +44
Power Limit % +50
Core Clock 1130
Memory Clock 1400
Aux Voltage +81

This setting listed above hold rock solid. I use OCCT to test for stability and play BF4 for hrs. Temp never goes above 40C.

OK, the problem I am trying to solve. If I raise my Core Voltage above +44 to +60, about there I am able to raise my core clock to 1150 and run OCCT for ever with no errors. But when I play BF4 for maybe 10 minutes My center monitor displays ghosts or black screen. I think something is heating up that is not indicated by the computer sensors.
 
Solution
I have my doubts it's a heat problem, probably just a bit much for one of the 290X to handle. Have you ran any other GPU stresstests/benchmarks with the +60 1150 overclock to see what happens? Also, I've read that certain games just don't take well to GPU OCing as other, even with the same settings. BTW, that's a pretty highend setup you got there :)

davidarad02

Admirable
can you run some tests and give us the temps of the GPUs?

anyway, 290x's are known to be hot and loud cards. you dont want to turn the voltage up too much, as it will cause stuff like you are experiencing, and making the lifespan of the GPU shorter.
 
I have my doubts it's a heat problem, probably just a bit much for one of the 290X to handle. Have you ran any other GPU stresstests/benchmarks with the +60 1150 overclock to see what happens? Also, I've read that certain games just don't take well to GPU OCing as other, even with the same settings. BTW, that's a pretty highend setup you got there :)
 
Solution

tsmith154

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2011
138
0
18,690


Thanks for posting. I run water cooling and the water is cooled down to 30 to 40 F. The indicated temps are always below 40c. But there are areas on the cards that do not have cooling. I read that the area that controls the voltage can get hot and that is on the back side of the card. I just ordered some heat sinks for that area. For all three cards.

My temps for card (1) is 34C, Card (2) 40C, and card (3) is 32C.

Sure, I will download some other stress tests and report back. I will get back with that information on Sunday.

I forgot to ask 1LiquidPC and Davidarad02. Any particular tests / software you would like me to test with?
 

tsmith154

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2011
138
0
18,690


Hi 1liquidPC,

Thanks for posting. I will run some other stress test and report back on Sunday. I know I already mentioned with another reply to Davidarad02 but "I read that the area that controls the voltage can get hot and that is on the back side of the card. I just ordered some heat sinks for that area. For all three cards."

P.S. to 1LiquidPC and Davidarad02,

I found my gpu in slot #1, on the back side of the card where the voltage control takes place gets hot while playing BF4. I will take a optic temperature reading of that area on Monday. I do not have the tool to read the temp at home right now. The other two cards don't seem to have the same area getting nearly as hot. The card inn slot one is in a pci-16 slot. The second card also is in a pci-e 16 slot, this card is second in the race for heat on the back side of the card. The card that is running pci-e 8 slot is barely warm. That is all on the back side of the cards where the voltage is controlled.

I forgot to ask 1LiquidPC and Davidarad02. Any particular tests / software you would like me to test with?

Thanks for the complement on my rig 1LiquidPC. I just built with in the month, about.
 

tsmith154

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2011
138
0
18,690
Ok, I found myself with nothing to do so I did some bench marks. These are the free versions of the software.

Performance Test 8: 6918.2

3d Mark 1.4.828
* Fire Strike: 22924
* Skydiver: 46344
* Cloud Gate: 33893
* Ice Storm: 215963
*Fire Strike score compare/ Better than 99% (The software just has this listed).
This program was only using one of my monitors though. It looks like I need to buy the program to have all three monitors being used for the test.

During the tests my gpu temps really did not bat an eye. GPU1: 35C, GPU2 41C, and GPU3 35C.

GPU settings:
Core voltage: +63
Power Limit: +50%
Core Clock: 1150
Memore Clock: 1400
Aux Voltage: +94

UPDATE: I just ran OCCT 4.4.1 and I have some errors. One sec and let me up the voltage.

New settings:

GPU settings:
Core voltage: +81
Power Limit: +50%
Core Clock: 1150
Memore Clock: 1400
Aux Voltage: +94

3d Mark 1.4.828
* Fire Strike: 22654
* Skydiver: 46085
* Cloud Gate: 33908
* Ice Storm: 216261

GPU temps:
GPU1: 30C max
GPU2: 40C max
GPU3: 31C max

OCCT 4.4.1
Short run but with no errors.
I will run it for an hr. or more tonight.

The cards get an indicated temp higher when I play BF4.

Is there any other tests you would like me to run. Any good stress tests you would think I should run to get the cards warmed up like BF4 or better?
 

tsmith154

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2011
138
0
18,690


Thanks. Kombustor will not run...

Unigine Heaven Benchmark works. I will run this for an extended period of time and report back with the results.

After about two hrs. of running:
Waiting for results.

Scores:
Render: Direct 3D11
Preset: Custom
Qulity: Ultra
Tessellation: Extreme
Full screen: 5760 X 1080


GPU: Stock
FPS: 63.4
Score: 1598
Observation: I was not running MSI Afterburner to monitor the cards.

GPU: 1130
FPS: 68.4
Score: 1723
All three GPU cards held there clock speeds but they were not all used 100%. The use went up and down but not as bad as the GPU 1150.

GPU: 1150
FPS: 69.9
Score: 1762
All three GPU cards held there clock speeds but they were not all used 100% All the same but the use went up and down during the testing more than GPU 1130.

GPU: 1160
FPS: 70
Score: 1770
All three GPU cards held there clock speeds but they were not all used 100% All the same but the use went up and down during the testing more than GPU 1130 and 1150.

Maybe the reason why the GPU % use is not used all the way because the test is just using them as much as it needs to be. Any thoughts on this situation?


Note: I found out I need to set the MSI Afterburner settings first then go into AMD Catalyst Control Center and turn on the "Enable Graphics OverDrive" and then set the Power limit settings to 50% for all three cards. Other wise, if I do not. When I go back into MSI Afterburner and look at my power settings they are back to 0%. If I do adjust the OverDrive then when I go back into the MSI Afterburner the power is still at 50%.

Observation: I heard a squeal when the tests were under full stress. I located the squeal inside my power supply. The fan for the power supply is barely moving any air.

Thought: A new MSI Afterburner is out so I upgraded to it. Using this software I noticed that my GPU voltage is varying allot, to my opinion. When I am not stressing the cards the GPU voltage is 1266mv. But when under load the voltage is jumping as low as 1172 mv. It does not stay at a set voltage. It is jumping between 1230mv and 1172 mv. I wonder if I am having a power supply problem.

The back side of my Gpu slot 1 card back side is reaching 135F. No really hot to my understanding. Since I have the heat sinks coming already I will install them.

Trying on Tuesday or Wednesday: install the heat sinks for those areas. Install a fan to force allot more air through the power supply. Finally report back with my results.
 

tsmith154

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2011
138
0
18,690
Could to high of voltage mess things up? Besides over heating. As long as I keep the temperatures down. During the stress test and bench mark testing the higher the voltage the more stable it gets. But bf4 so far anything above +44 it gets ghosts (center monitor only) normally after a short period of time and if I really crank up the voltage then I immediately get ghosts (center monitor only) and sometimes the center monitor goes black.
 
Extreme voltages can damage parts regardless of temp. I couldn't say where the "safe" range for voltage is on 290X's, you would have to ask somebody familiar w/ overvolting GPU's. Anyways, high voltage can degrade a GPU just a like a CPU to the point where you could get crashes, even get to the point where the card would be no longer stable at stock speeds let alone overclocked. Worst case the card would simply die and you would have no picture. Also, the voltage dropping under a load is normal, CPU's will do the same thing, which is where Load Line Calibration comes into play, though it works differently with newer Haswell CPUs due to the FIVR. LLC will effectively keep the voltage the same, regardless of load at least much closer than not being enabled, though I've read this isn't particularly good either as sometimes it can overcompensate and cause a voltage spike. However, I'm not aware of GPU's having this feature, but again I've never OC'd GPUs myself, so there's probably alot of tweaks/settings I'm unaware of.
 
Also wanted to ask if your using Universal or Full-Cover GPU blocks. Your going to want to cool the VRMs if your using a universal block as you mentioned getting heatsinks. They can get pretty toasty stock let alone OC/Overvolted like your setup is now. It could be causing your problems if they're getting overheated. Can you try running GPU-Z? I remember using this to check VRM temps back when I was running AMD cards. You can set the software to record in real-time while gaming/benchmarking.
 

tsmith154

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2011
138
0
18,690


About the graphics cards cooling blocks (Koolance, VID-AR290X Water Block, Rev.1.1 (AMD Radeon R9 290, 290X). I really don't know. They do cover the complete front side of the card. But I am not sure if they even touch the portions where the VRM locations are. I measured with an optical sensor the back side of the card where the VRM locations are. It was reacing 135F. I believe the VRM's are on the back side, aren't the? Not really sure.

I did not know GPU-Z has that ability. This is great news. I will run that test tonight. Yesterday I was going to post my results after installing the extra heat sinks. Well, they just arrived today and missing parts. Bad supplier.

Thanks for this information. I am anxious to go test.

I just checked my order history with Koolance. It does say it is a full face water block. Does it cool the VRM section? I still do not know. It does not say anything about that.
 

tsmith154

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2011
138
0
18,690


I totally believe you. I just looked at the foot print of the contact points and sure enough. It does touch the VRMS locations.

I am going to run GPU-Z as suggested tonight to find out what it has to say about the VRMs temp.

It is great to have so much help.

Thank you.
 
Just trying to help :) Also, wanted to mention that using GPU-Z, I was able to read VRM temps when using my HD 5970 and 6990, but I'm not sure about newer cards. I know it doesn't work for Nvidia, which I'm using now. Also, looked up your block and it is indeed full cover, so your VRMs should be cooled just fine as long as the blocks are properly installed. Also, it would be great to see some pics of this setup.
 

tsmith154

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2011
138
0
18,690
QdbbFu.jpg


It is a mess right now but I took a quick snap shot and uploaded a quick shot I just took. The large white tubes are my manifolds for the input/output for car radiator fluid. This id. of the manifolds are 1.5" dia. The black pipes are the 1" id. supply and return lines. I have a car radiator outside in the garage with a box fax blowing through it. Right now it is below freezing so I use that to chill my radiator fluid. I have a 5 gallon reservoir tank out side as well. The fan pressed against the power supply is me, right at this moment forcing more air through it, just to see if there is an effect.

The highest reading out of all the VRM's from all the cards was 50C. The others are around 40C

BBTJ7H.jpg


A couple people suggested that I might not have enough power for the computer with this power supply. They feel I am running about 1250 to 1300. Maybe I should buy a 1500 watt power supply. I have read until my eyes are bleeding and so far I really have not learned enough to choose which power supply I should get. There is allot to this, I never new.
 

tsmith154

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2011
138
0
18,690


Good thought, but sadly I did. Every once in awhile I will pull the water blocks off and take them apart to clean. That was on the computer set up before this one. This one I did check the water blocks before installing them but it has only been a short while being used. The computer I came from is in the photo I use for my icon. I had everything cooled including everything on the motherboard. I still have all the water blocks for that but so far the heat sinks on this new board are maybe getting a little warm. I am sure the water pressure is high because I am using a high pressure, high flow 800+ gph, pump you would use to aerate a pond. It makes my garden hose water pressure feel like a drinking fountain pressure. If I take the return hose going to the reservoir and lift if up it is like looking at three garden hoses blasting water on full. When I squeeze the input side hose to the water blocks they are like rock solid when the pump is on and soft when it is not.
 

tsmith154

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2011
138
0
18,690


After doing all the tests that were recomended and never finding any heat problems. I would have to agree.

"GPU heating up?" Nope. I have used all the stress tests, watched the indicated temps, and measured any physical surface area of all three cards with an optical temp meter and found no indication of high temps.

One or more of the cards might not be able to handle the extra voltage but I have not proved that one yet. The question for this post was about the temp. Thank you for helping me prove to myself that the temp is not the problem but maybe the power source is. Or maybe not and I am maxed out on my system. I have another post about a power supply question:
http://www.tomshardware.com/answers/id-2496581/power-supply-system.html

Thank you and everyone for their help.
 
Just trying to help. That is a crazy WC setup you got there :) Never thought of going that extreme for temps. Temps should never really be an issue when things are flowing correctly. I skimmed over your other thread, and I would also recommend the Corsair AX1500i if you decide that the PSU may be the culprit. As pointed out, those 290X and your CPU are power hogs at stock, let alone OC'ed GPUs. The AX1500i has adjustable OCP, so you can set the amperage limits for each 12V rail, while monitoring power draw in real-time using the Corsair-Link software. I'm using an AX1200i myself(overkill for me), and I'm happy with it's performance, plus they do carry a 7 yr warranty.
 

tsmith154

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2011
138
0
18,690


Humm, Thanks for the advice. I was leaning towards the EVGA 1600 G2. Because the price is $110 less expensive and it looks like it has more than enough power to prevent any limitations my computer might ask of the power supply. If I read correctly it has 5Amps more on the 12v rail than the Corsair AX1500i. I really do like the ability "while monitoring power draw in real-time using the Corsair-Link software" It would be great now and builds I make when this one gets outdated. I believe the Corsair AX1500i has two 12v rails, correct? The EVGA 1600 G2 has one, I believe. If I have two rails don't I need to be concerned which locations I plug the cards into? to avoid plugging all three cards on the same rail?

I just read the EVGA 1600 G2 has a 10 yr. warranty and the Corsair AX 1500i has a 6 year warranty. Really both are way beyond what I need and really have no influence for which of the two amps to buy.

The EVGA 11600 G@ has 1600 watts and the Corsair AX 1500i has 1500 watts. That is leaning on me. But I really believe you guys and I don't think I need or will ever use the 1600 watts and 1500 watts should be enough for now and the long term. What do you think.

Thanks for you opinion and advice. It is greatly appreciated.
 

tsmith154

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2011
138
0
18,690


api's ? I will have to find out what that means first. :)

Just in case if that is referencing Mantle or Direct x than yes. When I try Mantle I get an instant crash even with no overclocking with the cpu, gpu's, and ram. Nothing else to overclock except the clock but I did that once and it worked. I went back to play with that again and that never worked again. I am stuck at 100.

When I was running my last mother board with two R9 290x cards I had no problem running Mantle.
Mother board: Asus Rampage 3 Formula
Ram: Corsair Dominator 6gb
Power supply: Corsair 850
CPU: i7 950

I still have the parts here. Anyone want to buy them? (plug) Except the power supply.
 

sacredbovine

Reputable
Jan 22, 2015
29
0
4,540

Yeah that's what I meant. If you're getting insta crash with mantle then I'm out of ideas (not a big OCer, just figured I'd test Occam's razor)
 

tsmith154

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2011
138
0
18,690


Well, it was a good question and who knows. It might have been a problem I did not try. Thanks for asking though.

api's ? I will have to find out what that means first. :)

Just in case if that is referencing Mantle or Direct x than yes. When I try Mantle I get an instant crash even with no overclocking with the cpu, gpu's, and ram. Nothing else to overclock except the clock but I did that once and it worked. I went back to play with that again and that never worked again. I am stuck at 100.

When I was running my last mother board with two R9 290x cards I had no problem running Mantle.
Mother board: Asus Rampage 3 Formula
Ram: Corsair Dominator 6gb
Power supply: Corsair 850
CPU: i7 950

I still have the parts here. Anyone want to buy them? (plug) Except the power supply.