It's not an issue. It's how the card is designed. The future drivers may probably try to run games under 3.5GB vram where possible. It may not.
The GTX 970 still performs as expected when it was released.
Nope, it was intenional by NVIDIA. Gtx 970 owners can be glad that this was not a kepler based card, but it is not possible to remove cache without disabling the vram that goes with it. It kind of irrelevant anyways, if you want the no compromises card, you should buy gtx 980
Nope, it was intenional by NVIDIA. Gtx 970 owners can be glad that this was not a kepler based card, but it is not possible to remove cache without disabling the vram that goes with it. It kind of irrelevant anyways, if you want the no compromises card, you should buy gtx 980
Well sorry but some people don't want to pay 550-600 on a card that's only 10-15 percent more powerful than its little brother which costs 200-250 less.
True, i couldn't agree more. But if you want the best you are always going to pay a premium for it. And if 4 gb compared to 3.5 gb really makes that much of a difference to the person buying the card then the reduced cuda count will be a deal breaker for sure. So my advise remains the same: if you want the no compromises solution, get a gtx 980.
True, i couldn't agree more. But if you want the best you are always going to pay a premium for it. And if 4 gb compared to 3.5 gb really makes that much of a difference to the person buying the card then the reduced cuda count will be a deal breaker for sure. So my advise remains the same: if you want the no compromises solution, get a gtx 980.
Well, If I could, I'd buy a 980 but its out my budget, so I got the 970. Its fine. I heard people are working on VRAM stacking, so I can wait.
Nvidia should have been working on it from the beginning. They already mention that they will optimize the driver to use fthe first 3.5gb first. As i understand it the design of 970 was,supposed to be improvement to their previous design (like 192 bit card with 2gb VRAM).