i3-3220 VS FX-6300

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
CoolDude X

CoolDude X

Reputable
Oct 12, 2014
583
0
5,360
I Want Results In Every Field Like Performance,Power Consumption And Anything And Everything...........And Also Tell Whether "AMD FX Series" Are Trustable Or Not
 
Solution
Vici0us
With either CPU you can't get a high end GPU because the CPU would bottleneck it.

I say go with FX-6300 and get a decent CPU cooler at least Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO. Once, you've done that start overclocking. With a decent mobo you should be able to hit around 4.7GHz.

I've overclocked FX-8120 to 4.4GHz and FX-6350 to 4.8GHz with ASUS 970 M5A97 LE R2.0 and Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO. I say go with that mobo, it's good for overclocking and a solid mobo overall.

As far as not having a bottleneck stick with R9 270X or R9 280.

Overall FX-6300 is a decent budget CPU. Specially if you're running more things at once FX-6300 is a winner.
Sort by date Sort by votes
BigBadBeef

BigBadBeef

Admirable
May 30, 2014
2,076
0
6,460
There currently aren't any bad CPU's on the market, except maybe 9590, but only because of bad price. As for the remaining part of your request, i find it insulting. There are so many benchmarks out there, SOOO many game performance comparisons, and you still ask it to spell it out for you. Use google, its actually free you know.

Next thing we'll hear from you will be you asking us to come over to you house and start cooking and cleaning for you as well...
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Vici0us

Vici0us

Reputable
Mar 29, 2014
561
0
5,160
With either CPU you can't get a high end GPU because the CPU would bottleneck it.

I say go with FX-6300 and get a decent CPU cooler at least Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO. Once, you've done that start overclocking. With a decent mobo you should be able to hit around 4.7GHz.

I've overclocked FX-8120 to 4.4GHz and FX-6350 to 4.8GHz with ASUS 970 M5A97 LE R2.0 and Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO. I say go with that mobo, it's good for overclocking and a solid mobo overall.

As far as not having a bottleneck stick with R9 270X or R9 280.

Overall FX-6300 is a decent budget CPU. Specially if you're running more things at once FX-6300 is a winner.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Solution
leeb2013

leeb2013

Honorable
Aug 5, 2013
1,967
0
12,460


Give me a few days to get all that information together for you, there's quite a lot of searching to do.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
BigBadBeef

BigBadBeef

Admirable
May 30, 2014
2,076
0
6,460


The question is not whether you can get the information for him, the question is should you? This whole topic smells lazy all over the place!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
CoolDude X

CoolDude X

Reputable
Oct 12, 2014
583
0
5,360


Yess "BigBadBeef" You Are Right,I'm A Bit Lazy For That Whole Lot Of Search So I Thought Why Not Some Other People Will Handle It.......Sorry For That
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
CoolDude X

CoolDude X

Reputable
Oct 12, 2014
583
0
5,360


Thanks For That,You Saved My Lots Of Time
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Pc6777

Pc6777

Honorable
Dec 18, 2014
1,125
21
11,465
i3 might be a little better for games that only use 1 or 2 cores. The thing is though that games that use only 1 or 2 cores are probably older and will run good on i3 or fx 6300. The fx-6300 will whoop i3 in newer 'next gen" games. It is also a hell lot more future proof. the 6300 is also cheaper. I use a 6300 on my pc and its great definitely get the 6300. There no point in Intel until you get up to i5 and i7 anything below amd crushes Intel price- performance ratio. The same can be argued for i5 but that's debatable.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom