GPU vs CPU - VIDEO EDITING

gloryofthesky

Honorable
Oct 11, 2013
62
0
10,660
Hey guys.


I was just wondering, is Adobe Premier Pro more GPU or CPU dependent when rendering videos?

What would see a bigger performance increase?

A) 5960X & GTX 980
B) i7 4770k & 2xK5200

 
Solution
Premier Pro is CPU bound. 5960x with a 980 will be a better option.

http://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Adobe-Premiere-Pro-CS6-GPU-Acceleration-162/

Going over 760/960 does not bring anything. And you can see that the only thing that brings a difference is the 4 core I7 vs the 6 core I7.

Do not waste your money on a video card. Get more RAM, larger SSDs, more SSDs and etc.

Shneiky

Distinguished
Premier Pro is CPU bound. 5960x with a 980 will be a better option.

http://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Adobe-Premiere-Pro-CS6-GPU-Acceleration-162/

Going over 760/960 does not bring anything. And you can see that the only thing that brings a difference is the 4 core I7 vs the 6 core I7.

Do not waste your money on a video card. Get more RAM, larger SSDs, more SSDs and etc.
 
Solution

Shneiky

Distinguished
It is a marketing thing. A Quadro K6000 is 4300 while a K4000 is 700 and a GTX 980 is 550.

Premier uses the vRAM on the video card most extensively. The more bandwidth and GBs - the better. The GPU only accelerates, but it does not calculate that much. The GPU can accelerate only what the CPU has already per-processed, so the CPU is your main bottleneck. This is also a reason why cheaper GTXs with more memory bandwidth win over Quadros that are twice the price.

http://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Adobe-Premiere-Pro-CC-Professional-GPU-Acceleration-502/#1080p%28PPBM6%29Results

Their first result is a real life scenario. The blue lines are the 4 core I7, while the red lines are the 6 core results. As you can see, going from a K2000 to K5000 does not bring much, but adding 2 more cores to the I7 drastically reduces the times.

Their second benchmark is a custom 4K resolution with only GPU accelerated effects. This is unrealistic, because in everyday editing, what you mainly have is CPU bound scenarios.

Also, on nVidia website, the advertisement is about Adobe Mercury Playback engine, which is rather different than rendering. Of course, for the advertisement purposes, nVidia packed the benchmark with GPU accelerated effects as much as they can. What you are seeing there is a theoretical best case scenario, which is even less than 1% of the use cases.

At the office, we have 4 Z420s with 8 core 3.0 GHz Xeons and 4 other Z420s with 6 core 3.5 GHz Xeons and all of them are with Quadro K4000s. None of us want faster video cards, but we all want more CPU cores. A K4000 is completely enough for 8 cores running at 3.0. You have to jump to 12 cores until the K5000 offers any performance increase over the K4000.

Going with a K6000 does make sense, if your prime software is After Effects. But it makes no sense if your prime software is Premier. Not to mention that a single GTX Titan for 900 beats the 4000+ K6000. In this day and age, for professional work, it does not make sense to spend more on a GPU than on a CPU. We are still in the CPU age.
 

Shneiky

Distinguished
Yes it will. But that would mean for you to get a dual CPU workstation with 16 core Xeons. And that on itself its just 10 000 USD+ for the 2 CPUs and the motherboard. The performance increase you get is not worth the investment. Single CPU machine is the best price / performance you can get.

http://www.mediaworkstations.net/i-x2.html

You can configure yourself a 2x16 Cored Xeon workstation with a GTX 980 for just 14 000. But if you are going with that price, just shell out 18 000 and get one with a K6000.
 

Vodoochild81

Honorable
Jan 2, 2014
203
0
10,680
This is an old thread but I was wondering the same thing. I have a 5290k and was deciding if I should upgrade to a 6900k 8 core...However, I found articles like this saying Premiere uses multiple GPUs, so wouldn't the video card be just as if not more important than a processor? If I go from 2 980s to 2 1080s wouldn't I see a much bigger performance boost than adding two extra cores?

https://blogs.windows.com/windowsexperience/2013/07/19/adobe-premiere-pro-cc-hands-on-multi-gpu-support-and-more/#Ac4eRR7MMuKB3Kbk.97