I don't follow it... I think the write endurance issues on SSDs are massively, massively overstated.
Even the lowest endurance SSDs have a rated duty cycle of 1000 writes... which when anyone actually goes to test it turns out to be hugely under-rated (stress-tests have successfully completed many times more writes than rated).
Let's go with a worst-case scenario of 1000 writes on a 100GB drive. That means in theory you can write 100GB a day, every day of the year, for about 3 years before the drive reaches its write cycle. Now admittedly it will actually turn out a little less than that because of write-amplification, and the fact that the drive will move static data around via wear-levelling processes. But even so, we're talking a huge amount of writes.
The pagefile does add to writes on the drive, but we're not talking about anything like the amount of data required. It's not a bad idea to turn it off, or if you have a secondary HDD, move the pagefile there (though if you're short on RAM that will impact system performance). But unless you really want to keep the drive a long, long time, or have an extremely unusual use-case for your system, it won't matter.
Is it technically possible to reach the rated endurance within 2-3 years: absolutely
Is it likely that servers (such as those hosting write-intensive databases) would reach the rated write endurance: absolutely
Is it possible for an enthusiast to reach it within 2-3 years: maybe with very unusual use-cases. Maybe someone processing hours and hours of 4K video every day on and off the drive might get there.
Is it likely that any 'normal', even heavy computer user will get to 1000 writes within the life of the drive: absolutely not.