Hello all,
I recently just traded up from 2x970 FTW+s to 2x980 Classifieds. Gaming def feels a little smoother; for some reason there was a lot of stutter with the 970s. One problem exists though...for some reason overclocking these cards seems somewhat underwhelming. For all the power delivery they have and the fact that I have to have 2x8 pin power connectors per card, I'm only able to reach about the same OC the FTW+s reached.
I use firestrike extreme as my test program. I test until I get artifacts or a crash. I'm getting about +150 core/+400 memory clocks which gives about 1530 core and 7800 memory. On the 970s I could do +150 core/+500 memory and that would give around 1540 core and 8000 memory. This is without touching the power target or voltage...nonetheless how is the 970s OC'ing better than the 980s which has a better power delivery? Was my chip lottery that bad? Does the 980 take off from the 970 when you start messing with voltages?
I know you can flash the bios, add to the power target and I know you can add voltage, but I was doing a comparison without flashing or adding voltage/power to either the 970s or 980s.
My top card is ASIC 63.3 and bottom is 77.1. Does the OC have anything to do with the top card's asic quality? Should I swap them as the bottom card has a much better ASIC?
Also should I have the switch set to "OC" instead of "normal"? I read that all that changes is the fan profile and I have the fans going at 50% during the test so that shouldn't matter.
I'm just really confused how these cards are supposed to OC super well, but the FTW+s OC'd a touch better?
Any suggestions appreciated.
Also the cards aren't overheating...they're no higher than 55-60C during Firestrike...and honestly usually under 50C.
I recently just traded up from 2x970 FTW+s to 2x980 Classifieds. Gaming def feels a little smoother; for some reason there was a lot of stutter with the 970s. One problem exists though...for some reason overclocking these cards seems somewhat underwhelming. For all the power delivery they have and the fact that I have to have 2x8 pin power connectors per card, I'm only able to reach about the same OC the FTW+s reached.
I use firestrike extreme as my test program. I test until I get artifacts or a crash. I'm getting about +150 core/+400 memory clocks which gives about 1530 core and 7800 memory. On the 970s I could do +150 core/+500 memory and that would give around 1540 core and 8000 memory. This is without touching the power target or voltage...nonetheless how is the 970s OC'ing better than the 980s which has a better power delivery? Was my chip lottery that bad? Does the 980 take off from the 970 when you start messing with voltages?
I know you can flash the bios, add to the power target and I know you can add voltage, but I was doing a comparison without flashing or adding voltage/power to either the 970s or 980s.
My top card is ASIC 63.3 and bottom is 77.1. Does the OC have anything to do with the top card's asic quality? Should I swap them as the bottom card has a much better ASIC?
Also should I have the switch set to "OC" instead of "normal"? I read that all that changes is the fan profile and I have the fans going at 50% during the test so that shouldn't matter.
I'm just really confused how these cards are supposed to OC super well, but the FTW+s OC'd a touch better?
Any suggestions appreciated.
Also the cards aren't overheating...they're no higher than 55-60C during Firestrike...and honestly usually under 50C.