Hello guys,
Basically this is the situation.I am overclocking an Intel 2600k on an ASUS P8Z68-V board.
At the moment it's sitting at 4Ghz with a negative offset of -0.070 (my board overvolted it a lot...).
During gaming/emulation(main things I do) the voltage arrives to 1.23/1.24V however during Prime 95 the voltage goes down to 1.2V cause of Vdroop.
If I try to increase the negative offset the system BSODs when testing with Prime.
Now,I was tempted to use LLC to compensate for Vdroop but I read that it's kind of pointless to add voltage when using a negative offset.
So,given the situation,do you guys think that I should keep things like they are now or ignore Prime and drop the voltage even more/turn up the multiplier?
If Prime is stable at 1.2V with a 100% load I think that games will probably be fine with 1.17/1.18V,only problem is that Prime will always be unstable because of Vdroop.
What do you guys think?
Basically this is the situation.I am overclocking an Intel 2600k on an ASUS P8Z68-V board.
At the moment it's sitting at 4Ghz with a negative offset of -0.070 (my board overvolted it a lot...).
During gaming/emulation(main things I do) the voltage arrives to 1.23/1.24V however during Prime 95 the voltage goes down to 1.2V cause of Vdroop.
If I try to increase the negative offset the system BSODs when testing with Prime.
Now,I was tempted to use LLC to compensate for Vdroop but I read that it's kind of pointless to add voltage when using a negative offset.
So,given the situation,do you guys think that I should keep things like they are now or ignore Prime and drop the voltage even more/turn up the multiplier?
If Prime is stable at 1.2V with a 100% load I think that games will probably be fine with 1.17/1.18V,only problem is that Prime will always be unstable because of Vdroop.
What do you guys think?