Does pixel rate and texel rate of gpu improves graphics quality?

arfiavenger

Honorable
Nov 30, 2013
298
0
10,790
For example : r9 270x has doubled pixel and texel rate than gtx 750 ti, so any graphics quality difference between these two while playing same games on same res and with same settings?
 
Solution
Graphics quality is going to be whatever the game can render. You may get slightly nicer looking graphics on a better GPU but can only show what the game is programmed/designed to show.

r9 270x will get more FPS at the same quality and resolution than the GTX 750 Ti but there would be no noticeable quality difference if you are using the same game and quality settings.

Matt Dobe

Reputable
Jan 20, 2015
621
0
5,360
Graphics quality is going to be whatever the game can render. You may get slightly nicer looking graphics on a better GPU but can only show what the game is programmed/designed to show.

r9 270x will get more FPS at the same quality and resolution than the GTX 750 Ti but there would be no noticeable quality difference if you are using the same game and quality settings.
 
Solution

Epsilon_0EVP

Honorable
Jun 27, 2012
1,350
1
11,960
The 270X is generally faster. However, if you know you'll be playing Nvidia optimized games, they should be relatively close in power, and the 750 Ti is cheaper. I'd go for the 750 Ti, but be aware that games that don't work better on Nvidia will not perform as well as on the 270X.
 

Quixit

Reputable
Dec 22, 2014
1,359
0
5,960
The 270x should be a bit faster overall, but it's not a huge difference. The 270x is more equivalent to a 760 than a 750 TI.

Check benchmarks to tell which card is faster because the specs are so complicated that testing is really the only way to compare cards.
 

Epsilon_0EVP

Honorable
Jun 27, 2012
1,350
1
11,960
Yeah, I agree with Matt Dobe. Either card is under the minimum specs for AC:U, so you might as well get the one with more raw power. Ryse is not particularly optimized on way or another, that I know of, Crysis likes more GPU power regardless of brand, and BF4 is actually considered to be better on AMD, or at least equal. The only game that does benefit from Nvidia is Far Cry 4, but I doubt it would be a noticeable difference. I'd get the 270X if those are the games you'd play.

Do be aware, though, that even at 900p those cards will struggle playing these games at ultra. These are pretty graphically heavy games, and even high-end systems struggle to run them at higher presets. And since neither card meets the minimum specs for at least one of them, I would not expect high framerates at ultra settings.
 

Epsilon_0EVP

Honorable
Jun 27, 2012
1,350
1
11,960
I'll list results without sources as I google them. If you want the sources, let me know.

AC:U -> The R9 280 (more powerful than either card you're choosing) does 25fps average at high settings, 1080p. You'll probably be under 30fps at high settings, then. Both cards should fare similarly here.

Far Cry 4 -> At 1050p, which is a tad lower resolution than 1080p, the 270X does just under 60fps and the 750Ti does just over 40fps, at ultra settings.

Ryse -> At 1080p, max settings with no SSAA, the 270X does 48fps, while the 750 Ti does 23 fps

Battlefield 4 -> At ultra settings 1050p, the 270X does 42fps, and the 750 Ti does around 35 (based on GTX 660 performance)

Crysis 3 -> At very high settings 1080p, the 7870 (the old name for the 270X) does 34 fps. I cannot find good info for the 750 Ti at these settings.

Looks like you'll mostly achieve your 30fps at 900p with a 270X. The 750 Ti will be just shy of that, though, so I'd stick to the 270X.
 

Epsilon_0EVP

Honorable
Jun 27, 2012
1,350
1
11,960
Possibly at lower settings. These results used high settings at 1080p. With a lower resolution like 900p (which reduces workload by about 30%) and slightly lower settings, you just might get 30fps. This also depends on the CPU, though, since AC:U is known to heavily punish that. I don't know how well the i3 you have will perform in this game, though.