Rowdyrauderson :
sincreator :
Rowdyrauderson :
Just as a point of reference, I have a 780 (water cooled with a 28% overclock) and an i5 3570k at 5.0Ghz. In order to get the most out of my 120hz monitor, I have to run BF4 at 1080p on medium settings with AA turned off (multiplayer).
So, if you really want to get the best use of your 120hz monitor investment, do not pair it with a 7970.
Just because he has a 120hz monitor does not mean he has to drive 120fps, lol. It just means he won't get screen tearing until he goes above 120fps. There are lots of people out there that have 60hz monitors that can't get 60fps in games with their setups.
So you substitute tearing for ghosting. Either way wouldn't the ideal situation be to drive a game at above 120fps, have a 120hz monitor and enable vsync? All I am saying is that in order to get the most out of that monitor, it would be silly to upgrade to a video card that is soon to be 2 generations old.
Ghosting is mostly caused by the overall response time of the monitor not the FPS displayed. If a monitor is 8ms response time it wouldn't matter if you were running 60hz or 120hz, it will have ghosting. The lower the response time the less likely ghosting is to occur. From my experience anything lower than 2ms won't have a ghosting issue. Even with 4ms response time, it is hard to see ghosting.
I'm not disagreeing with what you say as such, just that pushing 120fps on a 120hz monitor is not necessary at all to have a good experience. I also know that the higher the frame rate the lower the response time as well, but really we are talking micro seconds that most people wouldn't even notice at all. The card he is looking to upgrade to is vastly superior to the card he just sold, so it is NOT a waste, or silly as you suggest. Either way it is a huge upgrade and would drive his 120hz monitor a lot better than his older GTX660 did.