Upgrade my Radeon HD 7950 now? Or Wait?

skylanepilot

Honorable
Apr 9, 2013
86
0
10,640
Hi everyone,

I currently have an i5-4590/asus h97 gamer pro/16gigs ddr3/samsung 850 evo on the way. I'm replacing my old and true Phenom 940 setup. Since I'm tearing everything down, should I replace my 7950 now? What do the next 3 months look like as far as GPUs?

The 7950 does fine for me. It's stable while overclocked in ATI Catalyst, but I want it to be able to run The Witcher 3 when it comes out.

Please let me know your thoughts. From what I've read, it looks like the R9 280X is the best bang for your buck in the $250ish price range.
 

WhiteSnake91

Distinguished
I've also had the upgrade itch before but for 1080p tbh the 7950 is still a great card. I've been able to play any game on ultra, without the taxing msaa, or at worst, 1080p high settings even with my i5 3570k at stock.

The only real substantial upgrade would be gtx 970 level, but I think that's overkill for 1080p, of course that all depends what details you want to crank up, but I got out of the rat race of having to crank everything up, that'll eat your wallet alive.

anyway, it struck me as odd Witcher 3 lists the i5 2500k as minimum intel cpu, but the way slower phenom x4 940 as minimum AMD. That doesn't make sense, and they also list the hd 7870/gtx 660 as minimum gpu. That struck me as odd too seeing as it'll run perfectly fine on the way weaker consoles. That means our hd 7950 is barely scraping above minimum spec, I'm calling unoptimized. Maybe the devs think everybody is going to use their very taxing ubersampling mode, but I'm certainly not. I expected a $330 gpu at the time (hd 7950) to last longer than ~2 years. Certainly didn't see it barely scraping above minimum specs...which is ridiculous as it'll run fine on the way weaker consoles. I'm going to wait for video reviews.

I've actually been having random BSOD that points to driver problems so I ordered a gtx 660 on a good deal, it's a step below my 7950, but pretty much on par with the 7870, which played 64 player bf4 conquest on 1080p ultra (no msaa) at a constant 60fps with my stock i5 3570k, so a gpu on the 660-7870 level is certainly no chump, which is precisely WHY the high Witcher 3 requirements scream unoptimized to me. I like CD Red, but the specs are too high.
 

skylanepilot

Honorable
Apr 9, 2013
86
0
10,640


I do feel like the 7950 is still decent. I honestly think it will breathe even better when I put a better CPU/memory behind it. I'm definitely not one to want every game on max settings, so I hope the Witcher's minimum requirements are off. Or, I hope it looks good at medium-high settings and can be played at 30+ fps. I hope it's not another Crysis situation where that game required such ridiculous hardware to drive it at max settings.
 

skylanepilot

Honorable
Apr 9, 2013
86
0
10,640


Thanks for the reply. I have my new build going, and yes the 7950 runs NOTICEABLY better with the new processor behind it. I will wait and see.

:D