While doing research toward purchasing my first Sapphire R9 290X, I see there are two editions available of the 4GB TRI-X card, SKU ID: 11226-00 (Model# 100361-2SR) and SKU ID: 11226-16 (Model# 100361-4L).
The "New Edition" (henceforth referred to as the 4L) runs at 20MHz slower clock speed, and has 200MHz higher effective memory clock speed than the 2SR. Aside from that, the only technical/specification differences I can see are the 4L claims to support DirectX 12, whereas the 2SR does not, The 4L has 2x8 PCI-E power connectors, whereas the 2SR has 1x6 and 1x8 PCI-E power connectors, and only the 4L supports (or comes with) the Sapphire TriXX Utility software, not the 2SR.
So why the re-release? What (if anything) was wrong with the 2SR? Was there a glaring design flaw in the 2SR which has been fixed with the 4L or was there some hardware exploit on the 2SR for overclocking (which I fully intend to take advantage of) which is no longer possible on the 4L? Since both are still available for purchase at online e-tailers, which one should I get?
The "New Edition" (henceforth referred to as the 4L) runs at 20MHz slower clock speed, and has 200MHz higher effective memory clock speed than the 2SR. Aside from that, the only technical/specification differences I can see are the 4L claims to support DirectX 12, whereas the 2SR does not, The 4L has 2x8 PCI-E power connectors, whereas the 2SR has 1x6 and 1x8 PCI-E power connectors, and only the 4L supports (or comes with) the Sapphire TriXX Utility software, not the 2SR.
So why the re-release? What (if anything) was wrong with the 2SR? Was there a glaring design flaw in the 2SR which has been fixed with the 4L or was there some hardware exploit on the 2SR for overclocking (which I fully intend to take advantage of) which is no longer possible on the 4L? Since both are still available for purchase at online e-tailers, which one should I get?