Improving video editing performance (PowerDirector 13): add a graphics card, or build a new computer?

Status
Not open for further replies.

erikn

Reputable
Apr 16, 2015
4
0
4,510
I'm trying to figure out how to speed up video editing on my oldish computer. Your input would be very much appreciated!

I mainly use my computer (see specifications below) for still image editing in Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop. For that type of work, performance is satisfactory.

Recently, however, I've also started editing video using CyberLink PowerDirector 13. Typically, my recordings consist of two 30 min 1920x1080p videos, plus one or two high quality stereo wav tracks. I don't need 3D transitions, advanced special effects etc. - most of the time all I want to do is switch back and forth between the video sources using the multicam plugin, apply basic colour and lighting corrections, and maybe do some cropping and panning (PowerTools > Video Crop) before exporting to a lower resolution format.

Unfortunately, even this seems to be beyond the capabilities of my current system. Simply selecting, moving and resizing clips on the timeline, or switching between tabs, often produces lags of several seconds. (I can't figure out why - there shouldn't be any heavy computations involved in those operations, should there?)

Preview rendering is also very slow at times (which makes it a pain to do colour adjustments), and video often freezes during playback. When it comes to producing the final output, speed is less of a concern - I just do something else while the computer finishes the work.

My question to you: what software/hardware tweaks or upgrades can I do to improve performance, short of building a whole new computer? For instance, would adding a dedicated video card (preferred price range: a few hundred dollars/euros) help with the above specific issues? With only the CPU's integrated graphics, hardware acceleration does not seem to be available - but I'm not sure how much of a difference that makes in my case.

If you do think I had better replace the entire computer (except the ssd:s, preferably, which are quite new), I'd be very grateful for suggestions based on my needs as detailed above.

Best regards,

Erik,
Sweden

-----

Current setup:

Motherboard:
Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (SATA 3Gb/s)

CPU:
AMD FX-4170 BE 4-CORE 4.2GHZ 12MB

RAM:
16GB 1333MHZ DDR3 CL9

Drives:
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB SSD (system drive)
A-Data Premier Pro SP900 128GB SSD (Lightroom catalogue, Photoshop scratch disk)
OCZ Vertex 460A 240GB SSD (current projects)

PSU:
460 W

OS:
Windows 7 Professional 64 bit (recently reinstalled)
 

erikn

Reputable
Apr 16, 2015
4
0
4,510
Excellent points - thank you!

I suppose I could afford both the R7 and a new CPU. Perhaps I should even go for the FX-8320E? It has the same power rating as the 6300, but 8 cores instead of just 6. Also, it's been reported to overclock well, in case I'd like to try that later (after replacing the PSU).

(FX-8320E review: http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_fx_8320e_processor_review,20.html )

By the way, do you think the motherboard itself (or some other component) might start becoming a bottleneck at this point? As far as I can understand, the fact that the board only supports SATA II isn't likely to be a problem in real world applications. But maybe there are other limitations that I haven't considered.
 
your mobo will be a bottleneck, overclocking the FX 8core, also a generic psu, provided with the tower wouldnt be recommended for a gpu with supplementary power and cpu overclocking, so what is it exactly? sata 6 gb/s will be another worthy upgrade since you're editing large video files.
 

erikn

Reputable
Apr 16, 2015
4
0
4,510
Sorry for not replying sooner - I've been busy collecting large video files. :)

If I understand correctly, you're asking for more information about the PSU? It's this one: http://www.sweclockers.com/recension/14768-ace-of-sweden-ac-fsp460/1 (the page is in Swedish, but you probably get the picture). Note, however, that if or when the PSU proves insufficient, I won't be sentimental about replacing it.

But perhaps you're right - maybe I had better start over with a new motherboard. I'm really conflicted about it. On the one hand, if there's a simpler and cheaper way to address the problem at hand (i.e. the lags in basic editing and playback), I'd feel irresponsible not to choose that solution. On the other hand, I guess throwing money at an outdated motherboard could also be considered irresponsible ...
 

erikn

Reputable
Apr 16, 2015
4
0
4,510
But the 6300 and the 8320e both have a TDP of 95 W (whereas that of my current CPU, the 4170, is 125 W). So why shouldn't either of them work? What am I missing?

The picture probably changes if I try overclocking, but given your input I probably won't do that. Then again, what if the lower clock speed proves to be an issue (6300: 3.5 GHz, 8320e: 3.2 GHz, 4170: 4.2 GHz)? I don't know enough about the internal workings of the video editor to determine whether single or multi core performance is most important when it comes to timeline editing and playback.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.