AMD Fx - 6300 vs Intel i3 4160

Shuka

Reputable
Apr 14, 2015
43
0
4,530
Sorry to ask you this for the second time, but i didnt really made up my mind.

my build is:

GPU:
Gtx 750 sc 1gb

RAM:
2X2 or may be 2X4

Compatible Motherboard

Now, some notes:
1) Yes, i already have the GPU, so please dont recommand another one.
2) No, i wont be upgrading my CPU/GPU in the nearby future.
3) Please dont talk in pro's words (overclocking, bottlenecking..) but in noob's words.
4) If there is another CPU that u think is better for these range of prices, please note, but still choose one of these.
5) Please note the cheapest motherboard that will fit the CPU.
6) is one of the parts (GPU, CPU0 stricly better than the other so i should upgrade/downgrade the level of the CPU

Thanks alot!!
 
Solution
I agree with the person above, in 2015 I wouldn't get a dual core expecting to play new AAA releases smoothly, the fx 6300 will play stuff as good if not better than the i3 right now, and will very likely age better due to the 6 cores, and direct x12 when windows 10 releases in july will greatly help AMD cpu's too :D

I recommend this Gigabyte 760g board on a budget, 32gb ram, usb 3.0, 4 ram slots, even an old IDE connector. Don't go crazy overclocking on this thing however.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128565&cm_re=gigabyte_760g-_-13-128-565-_-Product


I used a Phenom x6, 8gb ram, and hd 7870ghz (r9 270x) pc for a few months personally until recently, and I honestly didn't notice much of a real world...

Shuka

Reputable
Apr 14, 2015
43
0
4,530


Its double than these prices.... please note somthing on the 100$ range...
 

Shuka

Reputable
Apr 14, 2015
43
0
4,530


I heard that the 2 cores are getting older and i wont be able to play games such as Dragon Age: Inquisition...
Also heard that the AMD Fx-6300 preforms almost the same as the i3 just with lower cost and higher core number.
 

spdragoo

Splendid
Ambassador
=1781&cmp[]=2317&cmp[]=307]http://cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=1781&cmp[]=2317&cmp[]=307

i3 performs better in single-core applications, but FX has more cores so if the application takes advantage of it it can match or exceed the i3.

As can be seen with the recent GTA V release, we're starting to see more games that require quad-core CPUs -- & not even "dual-core with Hyper-Threading", but actual quad-core CPUs -- as their minimum. So you'll start to see more & more applications that can take advantage of the FX's larger # of cores.

As for Tom's recommendations, the FX-6300 was last month's budget recommendation. It's dropped to "honorable mention" in the under $100 category now (http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gaming-cpu-review-overclock,3106-2.html), but they specifically state that the i3's slighlty higher performance is hard to actually see in real life...in other words, the extra bucks you'll spend won't really translate into noticeable increase in bang.

As for the i3 allowing you to upgrade later to an i5 or i7...that's with the LGA 1150 socket, which shortly will be as "dead" as the FX's AM3+ socket (Skylake, the new chips coming out this year, will forsake LGA 1150 for the new LGA 1151 socket).

The biggest thing is that your GPU confirms you're looking for a budget build, as I would guess your monitor probably tops out at 1080p resolution (if even that high). So, given the choice between a $100 CPU & a $120 CPU, I would normally save the $20.

The question, though, is what you mean by "cheapest" motherboard. That will depend on a) what features you need (onboard Wi-Fi, # of SATA ports, SATA2 vs. SATA3, maximum RAM you want, etc.), & how big your case is (mATX, ATX, etc.). Plus, while you're currently doing a budget build, you don't want to scrunch yourself into a build with so little wiggle room that any future upgrades will require a complete rebuild. For example, mid-tower cases can fit both ATX & mATX boards, but mATX boards tend to have less of everything: less PCIe slots, less RAM slots, less SATA ports, etc. Plus, they're meant for mATX cases. So knowing what case you have, what future plans you're considering (more RAM, more drives, additional optical drives, etc.), in addition to knowing the budget you have for the board itself, can help us make better suggestions. For example, both the FX & i3 will work with low-end mATX boards that will run $50-60. ATX boards tend to be a little cheaper for the i3, but the FX boards also tend to have higher maximum RAM sizes (both # of slots & per slot).
 

crispytheone

Reputable
Mar 9, 2015
150
0
4,710
Get the FX-6300, Dual cores, hyperthreaded or not, are not wise for future gaming.

I got the Asrock 970M pro3 for a build I am currently doing, its certainly priced well, it ended up costing me somewhere around $60, and has all the features I wanted in my current build, seems put together well.
 

mlga91

Admirable

WhiteSnake91

Distinguished
I agree with the person above, in 2015 I wouldn't get a dual core expecting to play new AAA releases smoothly, the fx 6300 will play stuff as good if not better than the i3 right now, and will very likely age better due to the 6 cores, and direct x12 when windows 10 releases in july will greatly help AMD cpu's too :D

I recommend this Gigabyte 760g board on a budget, 32gb ram, usb 3.0, 4 ram slots, even an old IDE connector. Don't go crazy overclocking on this thing however.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128565&cm_re=gigabyte_760g-_-13-128-565-_-Product


I used a Phenom x6, 8gb ram, and hd 7870ghz (r9 270x) pc for a few months personally until recently, and I honestly didn't notice much of a real world difference between it and my much stronger i5 pc. AMD isn't as bad as people online make them out to be. You'll be good for at least this entire console gen, both consoles are using 8 core AMD apu's. The dual core will increasingly get bogged down by stuff, especially in multiplayer, and especially if you want to stream/multitask


consider the fx 8320 if it's cheap enough, if not, the fx 6300 is fine. I would not try overclocking the fx 8320 much at all though on a budget board. People in the reviews have though, I just personally wouldn't much at all.

edit: actually I'd suggest this 970 chipset board for overclocking the 8 core, it has good VRM's http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128651&cm_re=970_am3%2b-_-13-128-651-_-Product
 
Solution