Crossed wires
.... R9 cards come outta the box with a pretty aggressive clock.... the 970 leads the 290x at 1080p at stock settings .... the the lead grows significantly when both overclocked. At 1440p, the 970 lead is smaller but at 4k 290x does better @ stock). You can see that in the link below
I want to know which of these cards is better. The gtx 970 is the msi gaming 4g $335 and the 290x is the xfx $310.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_970_SLI/20.html
At 1920 x 1080, the 970 is about 8% faster stock
At 2560 x 1440, the 970 is about 2% faster stock
At 5760 x 1080, the 970 is about 1% slower stock
At 3840 x 2160, the 970 is about 1% slower stock
At 1920 x 1080, the 970 is about 8% faster stock (12% OC'd)*
At 2560 x 1440, the 970 is about 2% faster stock (6% faster OC'd)
At 5760 x 1080, the 970 is about 1% slower stock (2% faster OC'd)
At 3840 x 2160, the 970 is about 1% slower stock (0.2% faster OC'd)
* TechPowerup got a 14% OC on the MSI 970 and a 10% OC on the MSI 290x
In BF4, one 970 gets ya 30.9 fps @ 5760 x 1080, SLI will get ya 55.7 fps
Cost wise.... don't forget to figure in....
a) 2 x 290x needs a 200 watt bigger PSU and prolly another case fan.
b) Ya get a $60 coupon get Witcher 3.
c) power costs ... unless landlord (or mom) pats utilities
and especially if ya pay a lot for power.
Was gonna say only had cupla weeks more for that Witcher thing but looks like nvidia extending til June 30
By then you might bel be looking at the 390x versus 980 Ti