FX 6300 vs i5 4590
- Thread starter kyomagi
- Start date
a39232
Honorable
- May 13, 2012
- 512
- 0
- 11,060
I would say the fx-6300 is a great option im not a huge Intel person but, the FX-6300 is great for streaming and playing games as well as good at overclock as long as you get a good Mobo. I have the fx-8350 4.5 ghz and a gtx 980 and its great. The difference in games will be negligible. Its not worth paying the extra for the 4590, get a good cpu cooler (hyper 212 evo, corsair h80i).
Gam3r01
Titan
- Jan 12, 2013
- 25,417
- 976
- 115,440
You may not seea drastic performance increase in framerates, however the 4590 is superior to the 6300 in nearly every aspect.
It runs cooler, draws less power, and has much higher single threaded performance which is favored in gaming.
It runs cooler, draws less power, and has much higher single threaded performance which is favored in gaming.
a39232
Honorable
- May 13, 2012
- 512
- 0
- 11,060
I would like you to know that I have benchmarked a 3770k with my fx 8350 not just benchmarks I mean actually took real benchmarking data and the 3770k and fx 8350 get the exact same fps maybe a little less or a little more. sure starcraft, skyrim the single threaded optimized games are going to have higher fps, but whether you like it or not games are becoming more multi threaded as well. intel may have a better memory controller but that's usually only useful for video editing. Intel usually runs cooler idle but it does NOT run cooler on full load they just have a higher thermal limit opposed to AMD. both me and my frend have GTX 980s we BOTH had to overclock our gpus just a little. the games that bottlenecked my cpu were only unity, Advanced Warfare, and one other I don't recall. I take benchmarks with a grain off salt, almost all benchmarks are optimized tward Intel like it or not do the real testing without adjusting the numbers then I will believe you.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram