Haswell compatible or non 'haswell ready' has nothing to do with reboots. The ill effect of using a 'non compliant' psu with haswell AND the newer extended c6/c7 sleep states is the psu's inability to 'wake' - it shuts off requiring a cold boot. That's it.
"The result has been power supply manufacturers scrambling to see if their power supplies can handle Haswell's requested 0.05A on the 12V rail as opposed to the ATX 2.3 minimum's 0.5A." "Both Corsair and Sea Sonic have been rigorously testing their power supplies to determine which ones definitely can handle Haswell's C6/C7 states"
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6953/sea-sonic-and-corsair-power-supplies-certified-for-haswell
http://coolermaster-usa.com/press_release/haswell/haswell.html
Nice list of psu requirement myths debunked.
This is from corsair directly.
"According to Intel's presentation at IDF, the new Haswell processors enter a sleep state called C7 that can drop processor power usage as low as 0.05A. Even if the sleeping CPU is the only load on the +12V rail, most power supplies can handle a load this low. The potential problem comes up when there is still a substantial load on the power supply's non-primary rails (the +3.3V and +5V). If the load on these non-primary rails are above a certain threshold (which varies by PSU), the +12V can go out of spec (voltages greater than +12.6V). If the +12V is out of spec when the motherboard COMES OUT OF THE SLEEP STATE, the PSU's protection may prevent the PSU from running and will cause the power supply to "latch off". This will require the user to cycle the power on their power supply using the power switch on the back of the unit."
http://www.corsair.com/en-us/blog/2013/may/haswell-compatibility-with-corsair-power-supplies
If users are complaining of cycling boot looping being related to using a non haswell compliant psu, they're mistaken. They have a different problem at hand and are blaming it on their psu not being 'haswell ready' which just means they're misinformed or don't understand the situation. I can claim my ferrari is junk because it won't go from 2nd to 3rd gear without using the clutch. Is there a problem with the car just because I said so as an end user? Or do I just need to learn how to drive?
The psu's don't die from going into sleep state - or shouldn't unless you're using a garbage psu and that's a totally different problem unto itself. Obviously your haswell ready psu works fine and I'm happy for you. A little investigation and research is all it takes to learn what the so called 'issues' are and how simple it is to avoid them. There's no need for people to shell out more money for a gimmicky label. Both my systems running 4690k's are using psu's built prior to haswell. One a seasonic 650w the other an ocz modxtreme 550w. Both have c6/c7 disabled in bios, took less than 3min to make sure the settings were disabled and like magic - both run 24/7 fantastically.
Not saying people shouldn't buy a psu because it's haswell ready, just isn't accurate to try and convince them it's the problem and it's a requirement. Especially in this particular users case. Their pc is constantly looping, ie stuck in a reboot sequence of power on/power off. It's not having trouble coming out of a sleep state requiring the psu to be restarted.
I tried googling for people reporting issues of boot looping problems specifically related to non haswell psu's and couldn't find any using varied search queries. All I could find were people who 'thought' that might be the problem suggested in their comments. A quick search on what haswell ready psu's are easily gives the relevant info I posted above outlining the only conflict using a 'compatible' vs 'non compatible' psu with haswell.
You say if not worried about c6/c7 why disable? Because that IS the known problem. Why would you not disable a useless feature for the majority of users that would cause a pc to knowingly crash? First off, it's ONLY pertinent to sleep modes. Not idling, sleep modes. Sleep states are low power conditions the pc 'can' enter (if the user has their pc setup in such a way) after a period of inactivity to save power. Under power settings in windows, users can enable/disable sleep states, hibernate etc. There are several levels of 'sleep' a pc can enter correlating to various levels of power savings. Most of these features are meaningless to desktop users and more designed for laptop users where battery life is a major concern - not when plugged into a power outlet like a pc is.
If you're willing to fall for marketing hype without educating yourself, that's up to you. You're obviously making arguments for things which you don't understand. As for blaming corsair for making crap power supplies, it's not 'blame', it's true. Aside from the axi line and maybe one other line, tell me how many corsair psu's rate tier 1 or tier 2 on anyone's psu list? The cx, vs, 'builder series' and so on are mediocre at best. Why is it companies like corsair and raidmax get bad reputations for low quality psu's and seasonic and evga don't? People just have a beef with corsair for no reason? They chose to go with bottom of the barrel parts on many of their units and fairly earned their reputation. No one forced them to.
Anyone is welcome to use whatever parts they want. If you want to build a machine using a biostar motherboard, a low tier corsair or raidmax psu or some other no name psu and so on, more power to you. You won't find any corsair psu's in my builds. To be honest, if I saw a person in a store with a corsair psu in one hand and an evga, antec, seasonic or something in the other - I'd give them $20 out of my own wallet just to save them the headache so they weren't stuck with the corsair.