Does screen resolution really matter?

Mendozer03

Reputable
Apr 25, 2015
91
0
4,640
Since 1440p and 4k monitors are so damn expensive, is there really any reason to spend that much more money on them? Or is a 1080p 140Hz monitor good enough when it comes to gaming?
 

disturbed force

Reputable
Apr 7, 2015
972
1
5,360
Depends how close you sit, I have a all three monitors and yes you can see a differance when sitting in front of them. If high quality graphics is your thing go higher res, if you're into twitchy fps go with less res and higher refresh rates, but the difference is noticeable with higher resolutions.
 

Joshua Martin

Distinguished
Sep 16, 2014
448
0
18,960
This is a loaded question..
Yes, a 1080p 140Hz monitor is perfectly fine for gaming.
Yes, 1440p and 4K ARE better (albeit more expensive). Better image the closer you sit.
The real question should be, Is it worth it for YOU to spend more money on them.
If you're perfectly fine gaming/working on a 1080p monitor, keep it. If not, and you have the money, go for 4k.
I myself see no reason to even come close to upgrading to a higher resolution monitor. It just isn't worth it to me.
Keep in mind, depending on your current hardware, you may need a huge increase in power (GPU, CPU, etc) if you're planning on gaming on 4k.
 
bit of a personal choice really

i got a 27 inch 1440p

yes the extra resolution in gaming is nice--but surprisingly to me the biggest benefit i have found is being able to open 2 browsers side by side and still see the full page width with no messing about

so its horses for courses when it comes to those choices
 
Here is the problem with increasing resolution or refresh rates:

1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels per frame.
2560x1080 = 2,764,800 pixels per frame.
2560x1440 = 3,686,400 pixels per frame.
3840x2160 = 8,294,400 pixels per frame.

Now, with a 60 Hz monitor, your video card has to refresh the frame 60 times a second to achieve "perfection".
120 hz monitors need 120 refreshes per second.
144 hz monitors need 144 refreshes per second.

Now, if you look around these forums, you are going to see that many, many people are having enough trouble getting to 60 FPS at 60 Hz.

When you jump to 120 Hz, you need exactly double what 60 Hz needs. And obviously, 144 Hz needs even more. Each step up needs stronger hardware. But that hardware to generate 3840x1080@144 Hz pretty much does not exist yet. I would go so far as to day that even 60Hz at 4k resolution is going to be a challenge right now. Its going to be years before we can double the pixel count output, and we need to quadruple it for 4k @ 120Hz.

1920x1080x60FPS = 124,416,000 pixels per second.
3840x2160x60FPS = 497,664.000 pixels per second.
3840x2160x120FPS = 995,328,000 pixels per second.
3840x2160x144FPS = 1,194,393,600 pixels per second.

Yes, 4K res @ 144 Hz would need 2.4 BILLION pixels every 2 seconds. We just ain't there yet Charlie.