Hello.
I have a 256gb Samsung SSD with my OS on, and i was wondering about the size of the hibernation file hiberfil.sys. I have read that you should just remove this as it takes up a lot of space, and that you will never use hibernation when having an SSD. I see that, but i like this fast startup in Windows 8/8.1 which uses the hibernation file also, so that kernel session and device drivers are saved to the hiberfil.sys.
My question is, if I just could reduce the size of the hibernation file, as i am not going to use Hibernation, but only shut down. This fast startup would not need that large a hiberfil.sys, or would it? So if i just reduced the hiberfil.sys by 50%(i think that is max reducing?) it would not mean anything on the boot time etc?
Or would you guys recommend disabling the hibernation file completely as these fast startup procedures may tear more on the SSD, because of the writes to the hiberfil on the SSD? Personally i do not think that these saves of kernel session and device drivers to the hiberfil cause that much of writing to the SSD, that it could be considered bad, or am i wrong?
Therefore i like to know if reducing the size of the hibernation file has any impact at all, when using these fast startups?
I am sitting on Windows 8.1 with 16gb of RAM.
I have a 256gb Samsung SSD with my OS on, and i was wondering about the size of the hibernation file hiberfil.sys. I have read that you should just remove this as it takes up a lot of space, and that you will never use hibernation when having an SSD. I see that, but i like this fast startup in Windows 8/8.1 which uses the hibernation file also, so that kernel session and device drivers are saved to the hiberfil.sys.
My question is, if I just could reduce the size of the hibernation file, as i am not going to use Hibernation, but only shut down. This fast startup would not need that large a hiberfil.sys, or would it? So if i just reduced the hiberfil.sys by 50%(i think that is max reducing?) it would not mean anything on the boot time etc?
Or would you guys recommend disabling the hibernation file completely as these fast startup procedures may tear more on the SSD, because of the writes to the hiberfil on the SSD? Personally i do not think that these saves of kernel session and device drivers to the hiberfil cause that much of writing to the SSD, that it could be considered bad, or am i wrong?
Therefore i like to know if reducing the size of the hibernation file has any impact at all, when using these fast startups?
I am sitting on Windows 8.1 with 16gb of RAM.