johnnyb105 :
nuffsnuff :
I can confirm the OP's observation. Happened to me at work about two weeks ago (I use standby mode as long as possible, so updates are delayed), and right now I'm facing it at my girlfriend's laptop. She kept Vista on it for two applications with no direct Linux replacement.
The affected PCs render almost unusable as the hard drive thrashes along for hours, and there is nothing to indicate the exact cause. All you will be able to drill down to is "svchost" - which is an umbrella for all and everything MS - hogging your CPUs).
Even if they didn't do it on purpose, the problem update still being pushed a whole month after being reported makes me think they are quite happy with people thinking it's time for a hardware upgrade (read: as no one in their right mind is going to _buy_ 8 or 10, why not collect the windows tax on new hardware?). This has worked for them so many times over, it'll work again.
Maybe its a older OS vISTA DID TAKE ALOT MORE RESOURCES THEN 7 BUT IM A GUY HERE WITH 4 TOTAL PCS IN MY HOME running all the time and we never saw a slowdown maybe defrag and scandisk your drive maybe reboot your system once in awhile but I myself cant confirm that there is a mysteries slow down as you 2 Op have experienced.
Thanks for the pointers, but I doubt it has to do with disk fragmentation unless introduced by the updates themselves. Esp. the Vista installation doesn't get used much, as I said before, and was working acceptably before.
I get a feeling that there is just so much background stuff that gets triggered by most updates (which, IIRC usually replaces half the windows kernel plus makes full backups of everything) that it never finishes properly, if you use Windows for less than say 3 to 4 hours. Next time you boot it up, it starts all over again and thus for the casual user renders the PC unusable each and every time.
Anyhow, other operating systems just don't do that wonky stuff.
My girlfriend can't stop shaking her head on why she ever touched Windows in the first place, after I installed Linux Mint on her laptop. Web browsing, word processing, online gaming, music library - less iTunes to some extent, and hence the "Vista fallback" -, media center client, plug in your HP printer and it just prints instead of downloading gigabytes of useless stuff and still not be able to do the core thing (this is what triggered the "conversion", as she was ready to give up computers altogether at that point.). I could go on for quite a while. Now everything runs clean and fast on 2008 hardware.
For the majority of computer users there is no need for Windows anymore, if only someone really showed them the alternatives and helped with the first steps. Not only that, most of those I did this favour seem to be loving what they got.
I'm not talking power users, one way or the other locked into the Windows infrastructure (I'm one of them at work), I'm talking about those who do everyday stuff. They're really better off looking elsewhere. Hardcore gaming is another thing, but nothing housewives and grandpas are that much into, aren't they?