Hi,
1) CPU:
This is doable for the intended purpose. It doesn't have to be too accurate, just close enough. If for example, you want to compare to a G3258 Pentium then:
a) BIOS-> disable all but two cores
b) BIOS-> disable hyperthreading
c) BIOS-> cap frequency
2) GPU:
This isn't really possible, but you can ESTIMATE quite nicely by using benchmarks for relative performance:
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/EVGA/GTX_970_SC_ACX_Cooler/25.html
*These charts compare using a good CPU, so using a lower CPU like a dual-core ATOM will not give you the same relatively performance. You should consider having a low-end card (or iGPU) and swap between it and a high-end GPU. Since you can change the core count for CPU in BIOS, and switch between a high and low-end GPU you can build up some pretty valuable insite into scalability.
Really, you just want to set your worst-case scenario (like dual-core + Intel iGPU) and ensure that works at min FPS and resolution.
Summary:
While you can't compare exactly, you can use the information I provided to get a close-enough estimate for your usage.
You really should have TWO systems, an Intel and an AMD if you plan to create games at all. You can get by with an FX-6300. It's not just raw performance either as DRIVERS factor into things. The lower the diversity of hardware you test on, the more likely you are to have problems you aren't aware of until after launch (then have a hard time fixing with no systems to test on).