SSD for Gaming (240 / 250 / 256GB)

MayuraDeSilva

Distinguished
Apr 30, 2013
123
1
18,695
Hi,

I've been eyeing on SSDs (2.5") recently and hoping to purchase one for my Desktop PC, with the help of you guys.

As I already have 2TB of HDD storage, the SSD will be mainly for OS and games only. Currently, both OS (+ Software) and games take up 120 GB, hence I believe 240 / 250 / 256GB drive would be adequate for my needs.

My primary concern is the "reliability" of the drive, and performance and value comes next.

Currently, the affordable / available models are as follows:

Crucial MX100 - USD 114

Crucial M500 - USD 125

SanDisk Ultra II - USD 128

Samsung 850 EVO - USD 118

Transcend SSD370 - USD 107


What would be the best pick among these for my requirements? Or should I wait a couple of months for a better drive?

If you have any suggestions, I do appreciate them as well.

Thanks in advance.
 
Solution

yeskay

Distinguished


For OS/Gaming level loading they all perform close to each other.

Get the "Anandtech Recommended" Transcend SSD370, which is second to none often get overshadowed by Samsung and others, also cheaper. Full review here - http://www.anandtech.com/show/8792/transcend-ssd370-128gb-256gb-512gb-review

With regard to reliability and warranty:

5 Years Warranty:
Samsung 850 EVO

3 Years Warranty:
Transcend SSD370
Crucial BX100
Crucial M500
SanDisk Ultra II

Yes 250GB is ideal for OS/Gaming:

Let's take Samsung 850 EVO - Usually 9-10% goes for SSD Over provisioning (http://searchsolidstatestorage.techtarget.com/definition/over-provisioning-SSD-overprovisioning), which can't be used. So available space is 230GB.

OS: 30GB after all updates
Software: 30GB

3 AAA Games:

GTA V: 65GB
The Witcher 3 - Wild Hunt: 40GB
Batman Arkham Knights: 55GB

Total available space: 230GB
Total space used (OS + Software + 3 AAA Games): 220GB

Update:

I'm surprised you looking for "reliability" and didn't consider Intel 530 240GB in that list.

When it comes to reliability, performance and warranty:

Intel 530 240GB (5 years warranty)
Samung 850 250GB (5 years warranty)
Transcend SSD370 256GB (3 years warranty)

Stay away from Samsung 840 EVO , as their performance is said to decay overtime, which is admitted by Samsung themselves. Everyone knows the recent debacle of inconsistency from Samsung 840 EVO and they almost solved over a period of 7 months after 3 critical updates. But still some experience poor performance as the SSD becomes older and older.
http://blog.neweggbusiness.com/news/samsung-840-evo-firmware/

In the end, I would say get either Samsung 850 or Intel 530. Both reliable, performs well, comes with 5 year warranty. But if you're ok with 3 years warranty, I would suggest get the Transcend SSD370.

Latest Pricing:

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

Storage: Intel 530 Series 240GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($119.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: Samsung 850 EVO-Series 250GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($97.89 @ OutletPC)
Storage: Transcend SSD370 256GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($89.89 @ OutletPC)

Update on SSD Over Provisioning & Final thoughts:

Yes overprovisioning do play a role in endurance & performance:

"SSD overprovisioning can increase the endurance of a solid state drive by distributing the total number of writes and erases across a larger population of NAND flash blocks and pages over time. It can also improve performance by giving the flash controller additional buffer space for managing program/erase (P/E) cycles and improving the probability that a write operation will have immediate access to a pre-erased block. The extra capacity is not visible to the host as available storage."
ATTO%20write%20256GB_575px.png

Given the better write performance, reliability, the usage of V-NAND in Samsung 850 and above all only costs extra $8 over Transcend, I suggest get the Samsung 850 EVO.

@MarkW - Good you know that you're not part of 5-8% of the people who experienced problems even after all firmware updates. "Samsung has retired the TLC 19 nm NAND memory installed in the 840 EVO in favor of three-dimensional 40 nm TLC V-NAND found in 850 EVO SSDs", that's how serious is the problem. V-NAND is thought to alleviate NAND flash voltage drifting, the culprit—some say—behind read speed performance issues in TLC NAND nodes thinner than 20 nm.. EVO 840 has problems. PERIOD

Cheers!
 
Solution
Samsung is the best SSD around in my book. They are the only SSD manufacturer on the planet that makes every single part in the unit in their own fabs. So they get to keep the best NAND chips for their SSDs. They sell off the lower quality chips to someone else. They design and fab their own controller chips specifically for their NAND. Not even Intel does that.

I have a 1TB Samsung 840 EVO. I beat the heck out of it daily. In the 13 months that I have had it, I have pushed over 500TB through it. And not a single complaint from it.

None of this is to say there are any problems with the rest of the brands on that list. I have just grown to trust Samsung SSDs.

After seeing the post above mine, I will add one little tidbit here...

Samsung 850 Pro
10 year warranty!!
 


The review you linked has the Transcend drive clearly behind in performance. Considering the 850 evo is constantly on sale for $80-90, I would take it any day over the Transcend. 850 evo is also backed by a longer warranty by 2 years.

Here's an example of a sale just yesterday on the drive
http://slickdeals.net/f/7931941-samsung-850-evo-250gb-2-5-ssd-89-99-with-promo-code-free-shipping-at-newegg
 

JingLuci

Reputable
May 16, 2015
340
0
4,960


I use a Samsung EVO 850 120gb for OS and a Samsung EVO 850 500gb for my game drives. And they are very reliable. My boot time is only less than 30s. And games loads at insane speed, especially those big games that have long loading times.
 
also consider price, the term 'faster' is not that easy to notice. ssd's are fast, even slow ssd's are a lot faster than mech drives.
so my advice, check for issues and extra features (like power loss protection) and price. and reliability
speed, personally is not on the top of my list.
i have an old intel ssd sata2, and back then intel wasn't on the top of the list in terms of speed, but it was the most reliable (issues back then were not uncommon). and i think it is 5-6 yrs already and still plenty fast
 
Well, maybe in an enterprise situation where you have these huge servers that are moving megabytes per minute around, maybe then power loss protection would be useful. But for the amount of data the typical person is going to have in transit at any given point, the SSD is going to be able to flush its ram out to the NAND memory in that timeframe. And the reality is that the SSD is going to be sitting there idle in excess of 99% of the time that we are in front of our computers. And just short of 100% of the time when we are away from the computer. So I do not see a whole lot of value in power loss protection on an SSD in a consumer environment.
 

MayuraDeSilva

Distinguished
Apr 30, 2013
123
1
18,695
Awesome! Thanks for all the prompt responses and suggestions, everyone :) They are indeed very helpful.

Thanks to you guys, now I'm down to two choices: Samsung 850 EVO vs Transcend SSD370

I've read about TLC and MLC lately, and Samsung 850 EVO is using a Samsung 128Gbit 40nm TLC V-NAND while Transcend SSD370 has a Micron 128Gbit 20nm MLC. Should I be worried about that at all - in relation to the lifespan?

And as,

... SSD Over-Provisioning would leave me at a disadvantage, or helps improve endurance and performance instead comparing to other drives?


Unfortunately, Intel drives are not available here and even if I order online, it costs me over USD 180 :/
 

MayuraDeSilva

Distinguished
Apr 30, 2013
123
1
18,695
Thanks bunch for the detailed and helpful responses each time, yeskay. YEAH, I'm gonna go with Samsung 850 EVO :)

I do really appreciate your information (incl. screenshots - very helpful) and sharing your personal experience on Samsung SSD drive, MarkW :) Wish I could select a 2nd Best Answer. Samsung 850 EVO, it is ;)